What is the official website of Platinum Towers, Kharadi ?

The official website of Platinum Towers, Kharadi is http://www.platinumtowerskharadi.com.

What is Platinum Towers, Kharadi's cybersecurity risk score?

Platinum Towers, Kharadi has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 758 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Platinum Towers, Kharadi experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Platinum Towers, Kharadi currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Platinum Towers, Kharadi been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Platinum Towers, Kharadi has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Platinum Towers, Kharadi is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Platinum Towers, Kharadi does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Platinum Towers, Kharadi is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Platinum Towers, Kharadi does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Platinum Towers, Kharadi is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Platinum Towers, Kharadi is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Platinum Towers, Kharadi operate in ?

Platinum Towers, Kharadi operates primarily in the Leasing Non-residential Real Estate industry.

How many employees does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have ?

Platinum Towers, Kharadi employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi own any subsidiaries ?

Platinum Towers, Kharadi presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have ?

Platinum Towers, Kharadi's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 17 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Platinum Towers, Kharadi ?

Platinum Towers, Kharadi is classified under the NAICS code 53112, which corresponds to Lessors of Nonresidential Buildings (except Miniwarehouses).

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Platinum Towers, Kharadi does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Platinum Towers, Kharadi maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/platinum-towers-kharadi.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Platinum Towers, Kharadi experienced ?

As of July 26, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Platinum Towers, Kharadi has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Platinum Towers, Kharadi have ?

Platinum Towers, Kharadi has an estimated 1,912 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

PTK

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

758

/1000

Fair

783

/1000

Fair

Platinum Towers, Kharadi Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

platinumtowerskharadi.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Platinum Towers A Premium Commercial Project Located At A Prime Location Of Kharadi Which Is also known as Eastern IT Hub Of Pune. Platinum Towers Offer Multiple Options Of Road Facing Shops, Showrooms, Restaurants & Office Spaces. With all Modern Features And Great Connectivity.

PTK A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

PTK

Platinum Towers, Kharadi CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

PTK Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for PTK

Incidents vs Leasing Non-residential Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Platinum Towers, Kharadi in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Platinum Towers, Kharadi in 2026.

Incident Types PTK vs Leasing Non-residential Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Platinum Towers, Kharadi in 2026.

Incident History - PTK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Platinum Towers, Kharadi Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PTK

Leasing Non-residential Real Estate

Website: http://www.platinumtowerskharadi.com

Company Size: 11-50 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Platinum Towers, Kharadi Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Platinum Towers, Kharadi CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-10681

SUMMARY

In Zephyr's userspace dynamic-objects subsystem, thread_idx_alloc() in kernel/userspace/userspace.c allocated a new thread permission index from the global _thread_idx_map[] bitmap without holding lists_lock. On SMP systems, two user-mode threads invoking the k_object_alloc(K_OBJ_THREAD) syscall concurrently can both observe the same low free bit, perform the same non-atomic RMW to clear it, and return the identical tidx. The two newly created K_OBJ_THREAD objects are then assigned the same thread_id, so the two user threads alias a single bit position in every kernel object's perms[] bitfield: any subsequent grant of access on a kernel object to one thread is implicitly a grant to the other, defeating userspace ACL isolation. A secondary lost-update window between the unlocked &=~BIT() in alloc and the locked |= BIT() in thread_idx_free() can also leak entries from the thread-index pool. The defect is reachable from any user-mode thread via the unrestricted __syscall k_object_alloc and is gated on CONFIG_USERSPACE, CONFIG_DYNAMIC_OBJECTS, and CONFIG_SMP. The flaw was introduced when the per-thread permission index was added in 2018 and is present in every release up to and including v4.4.0. Fixed by holding lists_lock across the bitmap RMW and the permissions clear (and inlining the obj_list traversal that previously took the lock itself).

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Impact Score

5.5

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66013

SUMMARY

OpenRemote before 1.26.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the console registration API that allows unauthenticated attackers to update existing console assets by supplying a known asset identifier. Attackers can overwrite push notification tokens and console metadata without authentication or ownership validation, redirecting notifications or denying delivery to legitimate consoles.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66012

SUMMARY

SiYuan before v3.7.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the POST /mcp kernel endpoint, which is gated only by a general auth check (model.CheckAuth) with no admin-role or read-only enforcement. This exposes 31 MCP tools, including a file tool with list/read/write/delete/rename/copy actions across the entire workspace. When the Publish server is enabled in anonymous mode (Conf.Publish.Enable=true and Conf.Publish.Auth.Enable=false), the Publish reverse proxy attaches an anonymous RoleReader JWT to proxied requests, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to reach /mcp. The attacker can read conf/conf.json to extract accessAuthCode, api.token, and cookieKey in plaintext, write arbitrary files in the workspace, and plant a plugin into data/plugins/ that executes with nodeIntegration:true and no contextIsolation on the next desktop launch, leading to administrator takeover.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)

cvss3

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66011

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-27 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the magick command-line interface when invalid options are provided. Attackers can trigger memory exhaustion by repeatedly supplying malformed command-line arguments to consume system resources.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64529

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - remove unused character device and IOCTLs The QAT driver exposes a character device (qat_adf_ctl) with IOCTLs for device configuration, start, stop, status query and enumeration. These IOCTLs are not part of any public uAPI header and have no known in-tree or out-of-tree users. Device lifecycle is already managed via sysfs. The ioctl interface also increases the attack surface and is the subject of a number of bug reports. Remove the character device, the IOCTL definitions, and the related data structures (adf_dev_status_info, adf_user_cfg_key_val, adf_user_cfg_section, adf_user_cfg_ctl_data). Drop the now-unused adf_cfg_user.h header and strip adf_ctl_drv.c down to the minimal module_init/module_exit hooks for workqueue, AER, and crypto/compression algorithm registration. Clean up leftover dead code that was only reachable from the removed IOCTL paths: adf_cfg_del_all(), adf_devmgr_verify_id(), adf_devmgr_get_num_dev(), adf_devmgr_get_dev_by_id(), adf_get_vf_real_id() and the unused ADF_CFG macros. Additionally, drop the entry associated to QAT IOCTLs in ioctl-number.rst.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…