Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. » PET1776853705

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PET1776853705)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-37
Company Score Before Incident668 / 1000
Company Score After Incident631 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPET1776853705
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORBatch scripts (*OhSyncNow.bat* and *notesreg.bat*) triggering remote XML flag file (*OHSync.xml*) on NETLOGON domain share
DATA EXPOSEDPermanent data erasure across all...
INCIDENT DATE14/12/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.'s Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. breach identified under incident ID PET1776853705.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/petroleosdevenezuela, the number of followers: 129470, the industry type: Oil and Gas and the number of employees: 25708 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 668 and after the incident was 631 with a difference of -37 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. and their customers.

On 15 December 2025, Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) disclosed Wiper Malware Attack issues under the banner "Lotus Wiper: Destructive Malware Targets Venezuela’s Energy Sector in Coordinated Attack".

Kaspersky researchers have identified a new, highly destructive malware campaign targeting Venezuela’s energy and utilities sector.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Energy and utilities sector systems in Venezuela, and exposing Permanent data erasure across all connected drives.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating resetting local user passwords, disabling cached logins and Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools (T1195.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attack appears to have been in development for months. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (T1059.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating two batch scripts *OhSyncNow.bat* and *notesreg.bat* orchestrate the assault and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating remote XML flag file (*OHSync.xml*) on NETLOGON domain share acts as trigger. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disables Windows’ Interactive Services Detection to suppress warnings. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating resetting local user passwords, disabling cached logins. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating disables Windows’ Interactive Services Detection to suppress warnings, Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating clears USN change journals, and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating overwrites every sector of all connected drives with zeroes. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with high confidence (100%), supported by evidence indicating permanently erases data across physical drives with no possibility of recovery, Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating deletes all Windows System Restore points by manipulating *srclient.dll*, and System Shutdown/Reboot (T1529) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating forcibly logging off all active sessions. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools (40%)
Execution
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (90%)
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (50%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (70%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (90%)
Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (60%)
Data Destruction (80%)
Impact
Data Destruction (100%)
Inhibit System Recovery (90%)
System Shutdown/Reboot (70%)

Sources & References