Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Peruzzi Auto Group » PER1782843975

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PER1782843975)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident822 / 1000
Company Score After Incident764 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPER1782843975
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED60 GB of data
INCIDENT DATE26/02/2025
STATUSConcluded

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Peruzzi Auto Group's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Peruzzi Auto Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Peruzzi Auto Group breach identified under incident ID PER1782843975.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Peruzzi Auto Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/peruzzi-auto-group, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Automotive and the number of employees: 92 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 822 and after the incident was 764 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Peruzzi Auto Group and their customers.

On 04 March 2025, Peruzzi Buick GMC Inc. disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Peruzzi Buick GMC Ransomware Attack Exposing Sensitive Customer Data".

Peruzzi Buick GMC Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 60 GB of data.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters mailed to impacted parties; disclosure to attorneys general offices of Massachusetts and Vermont.

The case underscores how Concluded, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Complimentary membership to Experian IdentityWorks; FTC identity theft prevention resources.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the dealership’s network was identified and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating qilin ransomware group claimed responsibility for the intrusion. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 60 GB of data exfiltrated, including SSNs and driver’s licenses and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pII and PHI compromised, suggesting access to sensitive systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 60 GB of data exfiltrated, including full names, SSNs, and health records and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised files contained PII and PHI. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating qilin asserted it had exfiltrated 60 GB of data and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threatened to release the full dataset on March 11, 2025. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack attributed to Qilin ransomware group and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating qilin claimed responsibility via a post on the Tor network. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack detected after unauthorized access and Hide Artifacts (T1564) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating investigation concluded over 15 months after initial intrusion. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (80%)
Defacement (50%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Hide Artifacts (50%)

Sources & References