Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » PermitFlow » PER1773152688

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PER1773152688)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-60
Company Score Before Incident752 / 1000
Company Score After Incident692 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPER1773152688
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTOREmail
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE09/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of PermitFlow's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts PermitFlow Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the PermitFlow breach identified under incident ID PER1773152688.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of PermitFlow's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/permitflow, the number of followers: 23742, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 114 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 692 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on PermitFlow and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "FBI Warns of Sophisticated Phishing Scam Targeting U.S. Permit Applicants", has drawn attention.

The FBI has issued an alert about a widespread phishing campaign targeting individuals and businesses applying for land-use permits across the U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, plus an estimated financial loss of $12 billion (U.S. victims in 2024).

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public alert and advisory.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Verify communications by cross-checking official city or county websites and contacting listed phone numbers directly. Be cautious of deceptive domains and AI-enhanced phishing emails, and recommending next steps like Use official government websites and verified contact information to confirm the legitimacy of permit-related communications. Report suspicious emails to the FBI, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Authorities are ramping up efforts to dismantle criminal networks and recover stolen funds.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including widespread phishing campaign targeting individuals and businesses, and fraudulent emails demanding payments for fake permit fees, Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating emails include accurate details such as property addresses, case numbers, and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating official-looking letterhead, professional language in emails. Under the Resource Development tactic, the analysis identified Acquire Infrastructure: Domains (T1583.001) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating deceptive domains like @usa.com instead of legitimate .gov addresses and Obtain Capabilities: Tool (T1588.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating aI tools are being exploited by scammers to refine phishing emails. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious Link (T1204.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating fraudulent emails demanding payments via wire transfers or cryptocurrency. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses (T1589.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating publicly available permit data used to craft realistic messages. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers use publicly available permit data to craft realistic messages. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating u.S. victims losing over $12 billion in 2024 alone. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating financial loss of $12 billion for U.S. victims in 2024. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (95%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (80%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (70%)
Resource Development
Acquire Infrastructure: Domains (85%)
Obtain Capabilities: Tool (70%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious Link (80%)
Credential Access
Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses (70%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (60%)

Sources & References