Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Perforce Software » PER1776784296

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PER1776784296)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident762 / 1000
Company Score After Incident760 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPER1776784296
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORExposed internet-facing servers with default/insecure configurations
DATA EXPOSEDClient information, internal projects, personal...
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2025
STATUSOngoing (as of disclosure)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Perforce Software's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Perforce Software Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Perforce Software breach identified under incident ID PER1776784296.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Perforce Software's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/perforce, the number of followers: 70177, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 2031 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 762 and after the incident was 760 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Perforce Software and their customers.

On 01 May 2025, Regional defense contractor disclosed Misconfiguration issues under the banner "Thousands of Perforce Servers Exposed in Widespread Misconfiguration Crisis".

Australian security researcher Morgan Robertson uncovered a critical security gap in internet-facing Perforce P4 servers, a version control platform widely used in gaming, semiconductor design, and other data-intensive industries.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting 6,122 exposed Perforce P4 servers (2,826 still active at disclosure), and exposing Client information, internal projects, personal data, credentials, source code, product schematics.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Perforce disabled the remote user account by default and updated documentation to improve security, and began remediation that includes Affected organizations were contacted to warn them of the risks; Perforce implemented configuration changes to mitigate exposure, and stakeholders are being briefed through Perforce published a blog post in May 2025 acknowledging the issue and emphasizing proper configuration.

The case underscores how Ongoing (as of disclosure), teams are taking away lessons such as The incident highlights the persistent threat of misconfigured enterprise software, even in systems handling highly sensitive intellectual property. Proper configuration and hardening of default settings are critical to preventing exposure, and recommending next steps like Disable default remote user accounts or enforce strong authentication, Implement network segmentation to limit exposure of internal Perforce instances and Regularly audit and monitor Perforce server configurations for insecure defaults, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Perforce acknowledged the issue and updated documentation to improve security. Affected organizations were contacted to warn them of the risks.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 6,122 exposed internet-facing Perforce P4 servers with default/insecure configurations, Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating 72% allowed unauthenticated read-only access via default remote user account, and Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (T1078.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 21% had at least one account with no password, 4% exposed unprotected superuser account. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating most servers permitted user enumeration by default and System Information Discovery (T1082) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating servers exposed server details by default. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included credentials and Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 21% of servers had accounts with no password. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included client info, internal projects, source code, product schematics. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating potential unauthorized access to sensitive intellectual property and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exposed servers could enable data exfiltration to attacker-controlled systems. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Windows Remote Management (T1021.006) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating internal Perforce instances with same insecure defaults create privilege escalation risk. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unprotected superuser accounts enabling full system compromise via command injection. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Valid Accounts (95%)
Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (90%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (85%)
System Information Discovery (80%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (80%)
Brute Force: Password Guessing (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Windows Remote Management (60%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)

Sources & References