Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PEP1776869574)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of PepsiCo's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts PepsiCo Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the PepsiCo breach identified under incident ID PEP1776869574.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of PepsiCo's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pepsico, the number of followers: 9657828, the industry type: Food and Beverage Services and the number of employees: 158877 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 841 and after the incident was 823 with a difference of -18 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on PepsiCo and their customers.
On 28 January 2026, Mexican embassy disclosed Cybercrime Forum Seizure issues under the banner "FBI Seizes Russian Cybercrime Forum RAMP After Years of Facilitating Ransomware and Corporate Breaches".
On January 28, 2026, the FBI, in coordination with the U.S.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Corporate networks (RDP, VPN, SSH, Citrix, etc.), Government systems and Financial institutions, and exposing Corporate network access credentials, Stolen data from compromised entities and Private conversations and forum data, with nearly 7,707 registered users, 340,333 IP logs, 1,899 private conversations (3,875 messages) records at risk.
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Seizure of RAMP forum and associated domains.
The case underscores how Completed (forum seized), teams are taking away lessons such as The seizure of RAMP disrupted a major cybercrime supply chain, but leaked ransomware builders and tools continue to fuel attacks. The shift toward VPN exploitation and the democratization of ransomware through leaked tools highlight evolving threats. Corporate network access remains a critical precursor to ransomware attacks, and recommending next steps like Enhance VPN security with multi-factor authentication and patch management, Monitor dark web forums for corporate access sales and Implement network segmentation to limit lateral movement.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including rDP (Remote Desktop) access sold (59 listings), and vPN (Corporate Gateways) access sold (22 listings), Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including cisco, Fortinet, Citrix VPN vulnerabilities exploited, and sonicWall VPN RCE listed for sale, Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including domain Admin access sold (12 listings), and vPN/Citrix access via compromised credentials, and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cracked pentesting tools (e.g., Cobalt Strike) used for phishing. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) programs hosted (14 active) and Command and Scripting Interpreter: PowerShell (T1059.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cobalt Strike and Core Impact tools listed (commonly used with PowerShell). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including domain Admin access sold (12 listings), and vPN access via compromised credentials and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating rDP/VPN access sold as persistence vectors. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating domain Admin access sold (12 listings) and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating winRAR RCE and VPN exploits listed for sale. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised credentials used to bypass authentication, Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cracked pentesting tools (e.g., Cobalt Strike) used for evasion, and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating malware (e.g., LummaC2, Mars Stealer) designed to evade detection. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating vPN access sold via bulk credential sales, OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating domain Admin access sold (implies credential dumping), and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating stealers (e.g., LummaC2, Mars Stealer) listed for sale. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating domain Admin access sold (implies account discovery) and Network Service Scanning (T1046) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating vPN/RDP access sold via automated scanning. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating rDP access sold (59 listings), Remote Services: SSH (T1021.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sSH/Webshell access sold (22 listings), and Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating domain Admin access sold (12 listings). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data from compromised entities sold on forum and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating corporate network access sold (implies shared drive access). Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating cobalt Strike and cracked tools used for C2 and Proxy: External Proxy (T1090.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating tor and clearnet mirror (ramp4u.io) used for C2. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware data exfiltration (e.g., AvosLocker, Conti) and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data sold on dark web forums. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating 14 active RaaS programs (e.g., LockBit 3.0, Conti) and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains (e.g., Bl00dy, KUIPER) deployed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- PepsiCo Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/pepsico/incident/PEP1776869574
- PepsiCo CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/pepsico
- PepsiCo Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/pep1776869574-pepsi-cyber-attack-april-2026/
- PepsiCo CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/pepsico/history
- PepsiCo CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.comparitech.com/news/inside-ramp-what-a-leaked-database-reveals-about-russias-ransomware-marketplace/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf