Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » People's Party » PEO1773326213

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PEO1773326213)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-51
Company Score Before Incident825 / 1000
Company Score After Incident774 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPEO1773326213
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information of members, including...
INCIDENT DATE22/02/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of People's Party's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts People's Party Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the People's Party breach identified under incident ID PEO1773326213.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of People's Party's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/peoplesparty-thailand, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Political Organizations and the number of employees: 55 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 825 and after the incident was 774 with a difference of -51 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on People's Party and their customers.

On 23 February 2024, People’s Party disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "People’s Party Data Breach Exposes Members’ Personal Information".

The People’s Party, a political organization in Thailand, issued an apology following a data breach that compromised the personal information of its members.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Membership application database, and exposing Personal information of members, including names, family names, national ID numbers, addresses, birthdates, phone numbers, email addresses, document images, and laser ID codes, with nearly 100,000 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Notified affected individuals, updated data protection authorities, and began remediation that includes Advised members to monitor financial transactions, check credit records, and change passwords, and stakeholders are being briefed through Facebook statement acknowledging the breach and commitment to data protection.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Members advised to monitor financial transactions, check credit records, change passwords, and be wary of phishing attempts, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Members advised to monitor financial transactions, check credit records, change passwords, and be cautious of phishing attempts.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating membership application database compromised and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating exposed sensitive data used in membership applications. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating document images and laser ID codes exposed and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating national ID numbers and laser ID codes compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, national ID numbers, addresses, birthdates, etc. compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating membership application database breached. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 100,000 members personal data exposed and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach with high sensitivity of data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high risk of identity theft and scams and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating laser ID codes can be used for identity verification. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating membership application database access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (60%)

Sources & References