Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pentagon Force Protection AgencyPentagon Force Protection Agency
VS
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

9000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, 20301-0001, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.pfpa.mil
701/1000Moderate

Pentagon Force Protection Agency is a civilian Defense Agency within the Department of Defense. Our law enforcement officers protect and safeguard the occupants, visitors, and infrastructure of the Pentagon and associated facilities, including the Mark Center and Defens...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:429
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

J. Edgar Hoover Building, Washington, 20535-0001, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.fbijobs.gov
100/1000Critical

This is the official Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) LinkedIn account and is used to build awareness of workplace culture, engagement opportunities, and the FBI mission. The FBI does not collect comments or messages through this account. The FBI is the premier ...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:10,425
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
19
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pentagon Force Protection Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has 1744.66% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Pentagon Force Protection Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pentagon Force Protection Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Pentagon Force Protection Agency

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PEN452042125
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FBI1789057420
🔒 Incident : Breach
FBI1788603918
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FBIMED1787142272

FAQ

Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pentagon Force Protection Agency or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pentagon Force Protection Agency or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pentagon Force Protection Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8