Comparison Overview
Penn Admissions

Penn Admissions
249 S 36th St, Philadelphia, 19104, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
First things first: We’re the University of Pennsylvania (aka Penn), an Ivy League research university founded by Ben Franklin in the heart of Philadelphia. Did that sound stuffy? It felt stuffy. Here’s what we’re really about: Penn is a place for people who want to do...

Georgia State University
33 Gilmer St. SE, Atlanta, GA, US, 30303
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Georgia State is an urban public research university and national model for student success in Atlanta, the cultural and economic center of the Southeast. The largest university in the state and one of the largest in the nation, Georgia State provides its faculty and mo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Penn Admissions







Georgia State University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Penn Admissions in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Georgia State University in 2026.
Incident History - Penn Admissions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Penn Admissions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Georgia State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Georgia State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Penn Admissions

Georgia State University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.