Penn Admissions
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
penn-admissions
Website:
Employees number:
8
Number of followers:
2,230
NAICS:
6113
Industry Type:
Homepage:
admissions.upenn.edu
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
PEN_2482962
Scan Status:
In-progress
Penn Admissions Company CyberSecurity Posture
admissions.upenn.edu
First things first: We’re the University of Pennsylvania (aka Penn), an Ivy League research university founded by Ben Franklin in the heart of Philadelphia. Did that sound stuffy? It felt stuffy. Here’s what we’re really about: Penn is a place for people who want to do something big. But it’s also for people for who want to try a bunch of little things first. It’s a place for sparking revolutionary ideas. For pioneering thinkers. And it’s a place that will help you figure out what inspires and excites you. Where you won’t just gain knowledge, you’ll make it. You’ll research solutions, invent ideas, engineer art – all in a culture that’s not about perfection, but about perfecting the pursuit. The people who love it here? People who are drawn to other people and who are curious about everything. This is the time to figure things out. Try everything that seems worthwhile. You’ll find what truly is. Sound like the place for you? Then we can’t wait to meet you.
Penn Admissions A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Penn Admissions Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 0 and 549
Penn Admissions
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Penn Admissions Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Penn Admissions
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Penn Admissions Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
5
Attack Types
2
University of Pennsylvania (Penn)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: In October 2025, the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) suffered a cybersecurity breach where hackers gained unauthorized access to systems supporting development and alumni activities. The attackers used stolen credentials obtained through **social engineering (phishing/identity impersonation)**, compromising thousands of pages of internal files. The exposed data included sensitive information about **donors, alumni, and students**, though the article does not specify whether financial records (e.g., bank statements, credit cards) or highly sensitive personal identifiers (e.g., National Insurance numbers) were stolen.The breach triggered **multiple class-action lawsuits**, with plaintiffs alleging Penn failed to adequately protect personal data and delayed notifications to affected individuals. While the university implemented mandatory cybersecurity training for all faculty, staff, and student workers, the incident underscored systemic vulnerabilities. The breach’s fallout included potential **reputational damage**, legal repercussions, and operational disruptions (e.g., threatened loss of system access for non-compliant employees). No evidence suggests the attack involved ransomware, direct financial fraud, or physical harm, but the leak of internal files poses long-term risks to trust and institutional integrity.
University of Pennsylvania
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The University of Pennsylvania experienced a **cybersecurity breach** in late October 2023, where an anonymous hacker exploited **sophisticated social engineering (identity impersonation)** to gain unauthorized access to critical systems. The attacker compromised **Penn’s CRM (Salesforce), file repositories (SharePoint, Box), a reporting tool (QlikView), and Marketing Cloud**, exfiltrating sensitive data. Initially, the hacker claimed to have stolen records of **1.2 million students, alumni, and donors**, including **personal information, donor memos, bank transaction receipts, and details of high-profile individuals like former President Joe Biden’s family**. While Penn disputed the 1.2 million figure, forensic investigations remain ongoing, and the university confirmed **no evidence of fraudulent use of the data yet**.The breach triggered **multiple class-action lawsuits** alleging negligence in securing personal data. The attacker also sent **fraudulent emails** criticizing Penn’s hiring practices and urging recipients to halt donations. Penn contained the breach, reported it to the **FBI**, and warned the community about potential **phishing follow-ups**. The incident exposed systemic vulnerabilities, with **no medical records (Penn Medicine) compromised**, but the leaked data’s scope—including financial and personal details—poses **long-term reputational, legal, and operational risks** for the institution.
University of Pennsylvania
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The University of Pennsylvania confirmed a **massive data breach** on **November 5**, exposing **over 1.2 million records** of students, alumni, staff, and community affiliates. The breach originated from a **social engineering scam**, where attackers compromised systems linked to the university’s **development and alumni activities**. Stolen data includes **personally identifiable information (PII)**, some dating back decades, along with **banking details**, though no medical records were affected. Fraudulent emails were sent to members of the Penn community, impersonating the **Graduate School of Education (GSE)**, before the university locked down affected systems. The lack of **multifactor authentication (MFA)** on certain accounts was identified as a key vulnerability, enabling unauthorized access and data theft. The incident underscores the risks of **phishing attacks** and inadequate access controls in educational institutions, leading to **large-scale exposure of sensitive personal and financial data** with potential long-term repercussions for identity theft and fraud.
University of Pennsylvania (UPenn)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: On October 31, UPenn suffered a **data breach** where hackers claimed to have exfiltrated **1.2 million records**, including sensitive personal data of ultra-high-net-worth individuals (e.g., donors, former President Joe Biden), with birthdates dating back to the 1920s. The breach exploited **social engineering** via a compromised PennKey, allowing attackers to access the **Salesforce Marketing Cloud** and send a malicious email impersonating the Graduate School of Education. While the hackers’ primary motivation was **financial gain**—targeting wealthy donors—they also exposed internal criticisms of UPenn’s security practices and compliance violations (e.g., FERPA). The breach highlights vulnerabilities in UPenn’s **decentralized security infrastructure**, though the full scope of leaked data (e.g., Social Security numbers, financial records) remains unconfirmed pending investigation. The attack underscores risks to **reputation, financial fraud, and regulatory non-compliance**, with potential long-term consequences for trust in the institution.
University of Pennsylvania (Penn)
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: The University of Pennsylvania (Penn) experienced a data breach where hackers gained unauthorized access to its systems using stolen credentials, specifically targeting systems related to development and alumni activities. The breach resulted in inflammatory emails being sent to students, alumni, and faculty, raising concerns about the exposure of personal information. While the full extent of the compromised data remains under investigation, the incident has already led to a class-action lawsuit filed by a Penn graduate, alleging the university’s failure to adequately safeguard sensitive information. The breach has caused reputational damage and potential financial risks, as affected individuals may face fraud or identity theft. The university is actively working to assess the impact and mitigate further harm.
Penn Admissions Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Penn Admissions
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)
Penn Admissions has 479.71% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Penn Admissions has 525.0% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Penn Admissions vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Penn Admissions reported 4 incidents this year: 1 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 3 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Penn Admissions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Penn Admissions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Penn Admissions Company Subsidiaries
First things first: We’re the University of Pennsylvania (aka Penn), an Ivy League research university founded by Ben Franklin in the heart of Philadelphia. Did that sound stuffy? It felt stuffy. Here’s what we’re really about: Penn is a place for people who want to do something big. But it’s also for people for who want to try a bunch of little things first. It’s a place for sparking revolutionary ideas. For pioneering thinkers. And it’s a place that will help you figure out what inspires and excites you. Where you won’t just gain knowledge, you’ll make it. You’ll research solutions, invent ideas, engineer art – all in a culture that’s not about perfection, but about perfecting the pursuit. The people who love it here? People who are drawn to other people and who are curious about everything. This is the time to figure things out. Try everything that seems worthwhile. You’ll find what truly is. Sound like the place for you? Then we can’t wait to meet you.
Loading...
Penn Admissions Similar Companies
University of the Witwatersrand
Wits is strategically located in Johannesburg, a world class city, with countless opportunities for students and staff to engage with and present solutions that will contribute to our country's knowledge-base and build our future. With more than 200 000 graduates in its 98-year history, Wits has and
North Carolina State University
With more than 34,000 students and 7,000 faculty and staff, North Carolina State University is a comprehensive university known for its leadership in education and research, and globally recognized for its science, technology, engineering and mathematics leadership. NC State students, faculty and
University of California, San Francisco
UC San Francisco is driven by the idea that when the best research, the best education and the best patient care converge, great breakthroughs are achieved. We pursue this integrated excellence with singular focus, fueled by collaboration among our top-ranked professional and graduate schools, medic
University of Oxford
Ranked number one in the world in the 2025 Times Higher Education World Rankings, we are at the forefront of the full range of academic disciplines, including medical sciences; mathematical, physical and life sciences; humanities; and social sciences. As the oldest university in the English-speaking
Colorado State University
At Colorado State, there’s this energy we all share—this undeniable excitement for what’s next. And it’s a feeling you can only find here. As you choose a college, one of the biggest questions most students have is what to study. At Colorado State, we offer over 250 programs, over 50 minors, and se
University of North Texas
Ranked a Tier One research institution by the Carnegie Classification, UNT is one of the nation’s largest public research universities with more than 46,000 students who push creative boundaries and graduate with credentials of value so they can become tomorrow’s leaders. UNT is recognized as a Mino
The Johns Hopkins University
We are America’s first research university, founded in 1876 on the principle that by pursuing big ideas and sharing what we learn, we can make the world a better place. For more than 140 years, our faculty and students have worked side by side in pursuit of discoveries that improve lives. Johns Hop
University of Cape Town
UCT is one of the leading higher education institutions on the African continent and has a tradition of academic excellence that is respected worldwide. Situated on spectacular Devil’s Peak, it is Africa’s oldest and foremost university. Three worldwide rankings have placed UCT among the world’s
Florida International University
FIU is Miami's public research university. Offering bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees, both on campus and fully online. Designated a Preeminent State Research University, FIU emphasizes research as a major component in the university's mission. For more than 50 years, FIU has positioned
.png)
Penn Admissions CyberSecurity News
November 18, 2025 08:00 AM
Lawyers seek to consolidate class-action lawsuits against Penn over cybersecurity hack
The consolidated class action case would assume the name of the first plaintiff, 2014 College graduate Christopher Kelly, and include “all...
November 10, 2025 08:00 AM
What Penn’s leaked internal ‘talking points’ say about recent University controversies
Among the thousands of files leaked in an Oct. 31 cybersecurity attack on Penn were several memos that appear to have been internally...
November 05, 2025 08:00 AM
UPenn Confirms Cyber Attack as Hackers Claim Data on 1.2M People
Cyber criminals who stole data from the University of Pennsylvania wrote an email crudely criticizing its admissions, alleging the...
November 05, 2025 08:00 AM
Penn Confirms Hackers Stole Data in Social Engineering Attack
University of Pennsylvania admits data theft after hackers sent taunting emails to alumni.
November 05, 2025 08:00 AM
University of Pennsylvania Confirms Data Breach Following Mass Emailing
The University of Pennsylvania has confirmed a cybersecurity breach that compromised systems tied to its alumni and donor operations.
November 04, 2025 08:00 AM
An Apparent Mass Hack at Penn Exposes Higher Ed’s Security Weaknesses
An apparent mass data breach and document leak have disrupted the University of Pennsylvania over the past five days, sparking a lawsuit and...
November 04, 2025 08:00 AM
Penn Data Breach Involves Decades of Student and Alumni Information
The hacker seemed focused on the Ivy League school's admissions preferences.
November 04, 2025 08:00 AM
Health care cybersecurity expert to address IST honor society on Nov. 4
Heather M. Costa, director of technology resilience at the Mayo Clinic, will address the Penn State Chapter of the Order of the Sword...
November 03, 2025 08:00 AM
Purported hacker behind Penn's fraudulent email claims to have grabbed donor data in attack
A cybersecurity site heard from someone claiming to be the hacker over the weekend. The university has alerted the FBI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Penn Admissions CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Penn Admissions
The official website of Penn Admissions is admissions.upenn.edu.
Penn Admissions’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Penn Admissions’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 419, reflecting their Critical security posture.
How many security badges does Penn Admissions’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Penn Admissions currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Penn Admissions have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Penn Admissions is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Penn Admissions have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Penn Admissions does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Penn Admissions comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Penn Admissions is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Penn Admissions have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Penn Admissions does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Penn Admissions comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Penn Admissions is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Penn Admissions have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Penn Admissions is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Penn Admissions
Penn Admissions operates primarily in the Higher Education industry.
Number of Employees at Penn Admissions
Penn Admissions employs approximately 8 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Penn Admissions
Penn Admissions presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Penn Admissions’s LinkedIn Followers
Penn Admissions’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,230 followers.
NAICS Classification of Penn Admissions
Penn Admissions is classified under the NAICS code 6113, which corresponds to Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools.
Penn Admissions’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Penn Admissions does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Penn Admissions’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Penn Admissions maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/penn-admissions.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Penn Admissions
As of December 04, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Penn Admissions has experienced 5 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Penn Admissions has an estimated 14,389 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Penn Admissions ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack and Breach.
How does Penn Admissions detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with locked down affected systems, and communication strategy with public disclosure, email notifications to affected parties, and incident response plan activated with yes (ongoing investigation), and containment measures with investigation into salesforce marketing cloud access, containment measures with email spoofing mitigation, and communication strategy with email notification to affected parties (pending confirmation), communication strategy with public statements via media, and enhanced monitoring with likely (implied by ongoing investigation), and and and containment measures with breach contained (as stated by penn), and recovery measures with ongoing forensic investigation; planned notifications to affected individuals, and communication strategy with public information page with updates, communication strategy with warnings about phishing/suspicious emails, communication strategy with advisories to review credit reports and activate fraud alerts, and and remediation measures with mandatory cybersecurity training ('information security at penn: a practical guide') for all faculty, staff, and student workers by dec. 31, 2025, remediation measures with training modules include practical skills to recognize and prevent cybersecurity threats (e.g., phishing, suspicious calls), remediation measures with advisories on preventative measures (e.g., monitoring credit reports, fraud alerts, vigilance against personal information requests), and communication strategy with email notification signed by provost john jackson jr., executive vp mark dingfield, and interim cio josh beeman on nov. 20, 2025, communication strategy with public webpage advisories on protective measures, communication strategy with media statement to *the daily pennsylvanian* by interim cio josh beeman..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: University of Pennsylvania Data Breach and Suspicious Emails Incident
Description: Students, alumni, and faculty at the University of Pennsylvania received inflammatory emails from an apparent hacker. The breach involved stolen credentials used to access systems related to Penn's development and alumni activities. A class-action lawsuit has been filed, alleging the university failed to protect personal information.
Type: data breach
Attack Vector: stolen credentialsemail compromise
Title: University of Pennsylvania Data Breach
Description: The University of Pennsylvania confirmed a massive data breach on November 5, exposing the personal information of students, alumni, staff, and community affiliates. The breach involved over 1.2 million records, including PII and banking details (but no medical information). The attack began with a social engineering scam, and fraudulent emails were sent to the Penn community. Lack of multifactor authentication (MFA) was identified as a key vulnerability.
Date Detected: 2023-10-31
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-11-05
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Phishing Emails
Vulnerability Exploited: Lack of Multifactor Authentication (MFA)
Motivation: Data Theft, Fraud
Title: University of Pennsylvania Data Breach (2025)
Description: On Oct. 31, 2025, the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) experienced a data breach affecting an alleged 1.2 million records. Hackers exploited social engineering via a compromised PennKey to access the Salesforce Marketing Cloud. The breach included sensitive data of ultra-high-net-worth individuals, including former President Joe Biden. The hackers, motivated by financial gain, sent a derogatory email to UPenn students from a spoofed Graduate School of Education account. UPenn's decentralized structure and alleged poor cybersecurity practices were cited as contributing factors. The investigation remains ongoing, with UPenn unable to confirm the full scope of the breach.
Date Detected: 2025-10-31
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-31
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social EngineeringImpersonation (PennKey)Exfiltration via Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Vulnerability Exploited: Poor Cybersecurity PracticesDecentralized Security CoordinationLack of Multi-Factor Authentication (implied)
Threat Actor: Unknown (self-described financially motivated hackers)Claimed affiliation: None
Motivation: Financial GainTargeting Ultra-High-Net-Worth Individuals (e.g., donors)
Title: Cybersecurity Breach at the University of Pennsylvania
Description: An anonymous hacker claimed to have compromised data for ~1.2 million students, donors, and alumni at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) via a sophisticated social engineering attack. The university disputed the 1.2 million figure, stating it was mischaracterized. The breach involved access to Penn’s CRM (Salesforce), file repositories (SharePoint, Box), a reporting application (Qlikview), and Marketing Cloud. Personal data, donor memos, bank transaction receipts, and information about former President Joe Biden’s granddaughter (a Penn student) were among the exposed records. The hacker planned to sell some data before public release. Over a dozen class-action lawsuits were filed alleging negligence in securing personal information. The FBI was notified, and the breach was contained. Penn warned the community about phishing risks and advised credit monitoring.
Date Detected: 2023-10-31
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-10-31
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Sophisticated identity impersonation (social engineering)
Vulnerability Exploited: Human error (deception of individuals into disclosing confidential information)
Threat Actor: Anonymous hacker (self-claimed)
Motivation: Financial gain (planned data sale)Activism (criticism of Penn’s hiring practices and donation policies)
Title: Cybersecurity Breach at University of Pennsylvania (Penn) Involving Stolen Credentials and Social Engineering
Description: On October 31, 2025, hackers accessed systems supporting Penn’s development and alumni activities using stolen credentials obtained through a sophisticated social engineering attack (identity impersonation). The breach exposed thousands of pages of internal University files, including data about donors, alumni, and students. The incident led to mandatory cybersecurity training for all faculty, staff, and student workers, as well as multiple class-action lawsuits alleging insufficient protection of sensitive personal information and untimely notification of affected individuals.
Date Detected: 2025-10-31
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-20
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Stolen CredentialsSocial Engineering (Identity Impersonation)Phishing (suspicious phone calls/emails)
Vulnerability Exploited: Human vulnerability to social engineering (phishing/impersonation)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through stolen credentials, Social Engineering (phishing emails), PennKey (compromised credentials via social engineering), Social engineering (identity impersonation) and Stolen credentials via social engineering (identity impersonation).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : data breach PEN2992729110625
Systems Affected: development systemsalumni activity systems
Customer Complaints: True
Legal Liabilities: class-action lawsuit filed
Identity Theft Risk: True
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Banking details
Systems Affected: Development and Alumni Activity Systems
Operational Impact: Fraudulent emails sent, systems locked down post-breach
Brand Reputation Impact: High (trust erosion among students, alumni, and affiliates)
Identity Theft Risk: High
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Data Compromised: Personal data (birthdates, names, etc.), Donor information, Potential ferpa violations (student records)
Systems Affected: Salesforce Marketing CloudUPenn Email System (spoofed Graduate School of Education account)
Operational Impact: Ongoing InvestigationReputation DamagePotential Legal Liabilities (FERPA violations)
Customer Complaints: ['Derogatory Email Sent to Students']
Brand Reputation Impact: Negative PublicityCriticism of Security PracticesPolitical Backlash (alleged DEI/affirmative action targeting)
Legal Liabilities: Potential FERPA ViolationsRegulatory Scrutiny
Identity Theft Risk: ['High (1.2M records allegedly exposed, including SSNs in prior incidents)']
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Systems Affected: Customer Relationship Management (CRM) - SalesforceFile repositories - SharePointFile repositories - BoxReporting application - QlikviewMarketing Cloud
Operational Impact: Ongoing forensic investigation; delayed notification to affected individuals
Customer Complaints: Multiple class-action lawsuits filed (14+ in federal/state courts)
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant (public dispute over breach scale, lawsuits, criticism of security practices)
Legal Liabilities: 14+ proposed class-action lawsuits (alleging failure to secure personal information)
Identity Theft Risk: Potential (Penn advised credit monitoring and fraud alerts)
Payment Information Risk: Yes (bank transaction receipts accessed)
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Data Compromised: Internal university files, Donor data, Alumni data, Student data
Systems Affected: Systems supporting Penn’s development and alumni activities
Operational Impact: Mandatory cybersecurity training for all faculty/staffPotential loss of system access for non-compliant employeesClass-action lawsuits
Brand Reputation Impact: Negative publicityLoss of trust due to delayed notification and insufficient protection claims
Legal Liabilities: Multiple class-action lawsuits filedAllegations of failure to protect sensitive personal information and untimely notification
Identity Theft Risk: ['High (due to exposed personal data of donors, alumni, and students)']
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, , Pii, Banking Details, , Personal Identifiable Information (Pii), Donor Records, Student Records (Potential Ferpa Violations), Historical Data (Birthdates From 1920S), , Personal Information (Students, Alumni, Donors), Donor Memos And Family Details, Bank Transaction Receipts, Information About Former President Joe Biden’S Granddaughter, , Internal University Files, Donor Records, Alumni Records, Student Records and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : data breach PEN2992729110625
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania
Entity Type: educational institution
Industry: higher education
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Customers Affected: students, alumni, faculty
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania
Entity Type: Educational Institution
Industry: Education
Location: United States
Customers Affected: 1.2 million (students, alumni, staff, community affiliates)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania (UPenn)
Entity Type: Educational Institution
Industry: Higher Education
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Size: Large (25,000+ students, $25B endowment in 2025)
Customers Affected: 1.2 million records (alleged; includes students, donors, faculty, alumni)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania (Penn)
Entity Type: Educational Institution
Industry: Higher Education
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Size: Large (22,000+ students, 100,000+ alumni/donors)
Customers Affected: Undetermined (initially claimed 1.2 million; Penn disputes this figure)
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Entity Name: University of Pennsylvania (Penn)
Entity Type: Educational Institution
Industry: Higher Education
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Customers Affected: Donors, Alumni, Students, Faculty, Staff
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: Locked down affected systems
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure, email notifications to affected parties
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (ongoing investigation)
Containment Measures: Investigation into Salesforce Marketing Cloud AccessEmail Spoofing Mitigation
Communication Strategy: Email Notification to Affected Parties (pending confirmation)Public Statements via Media
Enhanced Monitoring: Likely (implied by ongoing investigation)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: Breach contained (as stated by Penn)
Recovery Measures: Ongoing forensic investigation; planned notifications to affected individuals
Communication Strategy: Public information page with updatesWarnings about phishing/suspicious emailsAdvisories to review credit reports and activate fraud alerts
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Remediation Measures: Mandatory cybersecurity training ('Information Security at Penn: A Practical Guide') for all faculty, staff, and student workers by Dec. 31, 2025Training modules include practical skills to recognize and prevent cybersecurity threats (e.g., phishing, suspicious calls)Advisories on preventative measures (e.g., monitoring credit reports, fraud alerts, vigilance against personal information requests)
Communication Strategy: Email notification signed by Provost John Jackson Jr., Executive VP Mark Dingfield, and Interim CIO Josh Beeman on Nov. 20, 2025Public webpage advisories on protective measuresMedia statement to *The Daily Pennsylvanian* by Interim CIO Josh Beeman
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes (ongoing investigation), , .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : data breach PEN2992729110625
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Type of Data Compromised: Pii, Banking details
Number of Records Exposed: 1.2 million
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes decades-old PII and financial data)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Type of Data Compromised: Personal identifiable information (pii), Donor records, Student records (potential ferpa violations), Historical data (birthdates from 1920s)
Number of Records Exposed: 1.2 million (alleged; unconfirmed by UPenn)
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes ultra-high-net-worth individuals, former President Joe Biden)
Data Exfiltration: Confirmed (via Salesforce Marketing Cloud)
File Types Exposed: Database RecordsEmail Lists
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesBirthdatesDonor DetailsPotential SSNs (based on prior Columbia University incident)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information (students, alumni, donors), Donor memos and family details, Bank transaction receipts, Information about former president joe biden’s granddaughter
Number of Records Exposed: Undetermined (hacker claimed 1.2 million; Penn disputes this)
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes financial, personal, and donor data)
File Types Exposed: DocumentsMemosTransaction receipts
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Type of Data Compromised: Internal university files, Donor records, Alumni records, Student records
Number of Records Exposed: Thousands of pages
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes personally identifiable information of donors, alumni, and students)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Mandatory cybersecurity training ('Information Security at Penn: A Practical Guide') for all faculty, staff, and student workers by Dec. 31, 2025, Training modules include practical skills to recognize and prevent cybersecurity threats (e.g., phishing, suspicious calls), Advisories on preventative measures (e.g., monitoring credit reports, fraud alerts, vigilance against personal information requests), .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by locked down affected systems, , investigation into salesforce marketing cloud access, email spoofing mitigation, and breach contained (as stated by penn).
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Data Exfiltration: Yes (but not ransomware-related)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Data Exfiltration: True
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Data Exfiltration: True
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Ongoing forensic investigation; planned notifications to affected individuals.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : data breach PEN2992729110625
Legal Actions: class-action lawsuit filed,
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Regulations Violated: Potential FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) Violations,
Regulatory Notifications: Likely pending (FERPA, state data breach laws)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Legal Actions: 14+ proposed class-action lawsuits (federal/state courts)
Regulatory Notifications: FBI notified
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Legal Actions: Multiple class-action lawsuits filed (petitioned for consolidation on Nov. 17, 2025), Plaintiffs allege failure to protect sensitive data and untimely notification,
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through class-action lawsuit filed, , 14+ proposed class-action lawsuits (federal/state courts), Multiple class-action lawsuits filed (petitioned for consolidation on Nov. 17, 2025), Plaintiffs allege failure to protect sensitive data and untimely notification, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Lessons Learned: Enforce multifactor authentication (MFA) across all accounts and implement stricter access controls to mitigate social engineering risks.
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Lessons Learned: Decentralized security structures increase vulnerability., Social engineering remains a critical attack vector, especially in higher education., Balancing security measures with user convenience is challenging but necessary., Proactive ethical hacking (e.g., bug bounty programs) can identify vulnerabilities before exploitation.
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Lessons Learned: Importance of vigilance against social engineering attacks (e.g., phishing, impersonation), Need for timely notification of affected individuals in data breaches, Critical role of mandatory cybersecurity training in mitigating human vulnerabilities
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Recommendations: Enable MFA for all user accounts, Conduct regular security awareness training, Monitor for unauthorized access attemptsEnable MFA for all user accounts, Conduct regular security awareness training, Monitor for unauthorized access attemptsEnable MFA for all user accounts, Conduct regular security awareness training, Monitor for unauthorized access attempts
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Recommendations: Implement stricter multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, especially cloud platforms like Salesforce., Centralize cybersecurity governance to improve coordination., Enhance employee and student training on phishing/social engineering (e.g., UPenn's DUST program)., Conduct regular third-party security audits., Monitor dark web for leaked credentials or data sales.Implement stricter multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, especially cloud platforms like Salesforce., Centralize cybersecurity governance to improve coordination., Enhance employee and student training on phishing/social engineering (e.g., UPenn's DUST program)., Conduct regular third-party security audits., Monitor dark web for leaked credentials or data sales.Implement stricter multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, especially cloud platforms like Salesforce., Centralize cybersecurity governance to improve coordination., Enhance employee and student training on phishing/social engineering (e.g., UPenn's DUST program)., Conduct regular third-party security audits., Monitor dark web for leaked credentials or data sales.Implement stricter multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, especially cloud platforms like Salesforce., Centralize cybersecurity governance to improve coordination., Enhance employee and student training on phishing/social engineering (e.g., UPenn's DUST program)., Conduct regular third-party security audits., Monitor dark web for leaked credentials or data sales.Implement stricter multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, especially cloud platforms like Salesforce., Centralize cybersecurity governance to improve coordination., Enhance employee and student training on phishing/social engineering (e.g., UPenn's DUST program)., Conduct regular third-party security audits., Monitor dark web for leaked credentials or data sales.
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Recommendations: Enhance social engineering defenses (e.g., employee training, multi-factor authentication), Improve incident response timelines for forensic investigations, Proactive communication with stakeholders during breaches, Regular audits of third-party systems (e.g., Salesforce, SharePoint, Box)Enhance social engineering defenses (e.g., employee training, multi-factor authentication), Improve incident response timelines for forensic investigations, Proactive communication with stakeholders during breaches, Regular audits of third-party systems (e.g., Salesforce, SharePoint, Box)Enhance social engineering defenses (e.g., employee training, multi-factor authentication), Improve incident response timelines for forensic investigations, Proactive communication with stakeholders during breaches, Regular audits of third-party systems (e.g., Salesforce, SharePoint, Box)Enhance social engineering defenses (e.g., employee training, multi-factor authentication), Improve incident response timelines for forensic investigations, Proactive communication with stakeholders during breaches, Regular audits of third-party systems (e.g., Salesforce, SharePoint, Box)
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Recommendations: Enhance multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, Implement continuous phishing simulation exercises for employees, Strengthen monitoring for suspicious login attempts using stolen credentials, Establish clearer protocols for timely breach disclosure and stakeholder communicationEnhance multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, Implement continuous phishing simulation exercises for employees, Strengthen monitoring for suspicious login attempts using stolen credentials, Establish clearer protocols for timely breach disclosure and stakeholder communicationEnhance multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, Implement continuous phishing simulation exercises for employees, Strengthen monitoring for suspicious login attempts using stolen credentials, Establish clearer protocols for timely breach disclosure and stakeholder communicationEnhance multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, Implement continuous phishing simulation exercises for employees, Strengthen monitoring for suspicious login attempts using stolen credentials, Establish clearer protocols for timely breach disclosure and stakeholder communication
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Enforce multifactor authentication (MFA) across all accounts and implement stricter access controls to mitigate social engineering risks.Decentralized security structures increase vulnerability.,Social engineering remains a critical attack vector, especially in higher education.,Balancing security measures with user convenience is challenging but necessary.,Proactive ethical hacking (e.g., bug bounty programs) can identify vulnerabilities before exploitation.Importance of vigilance against social engineering attacks (e.g., phishing, impersonation),Need for timely notification of affected individuals in data breaches,Critical role of mandatory cybersecurity training in mitigating human vulnerabilities.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : data breach PEN2992729110625
Source: WPVI (6abc Action News)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Source: University of Pennsylvania Breach Notification
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Source: The Triangle (Drexel University)
Date Accessed: 2025-10-31
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Source: UPenn Public Statements (via email/media)
Date Accessed: 2025-10-31
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Source: Daily Pennsylvanian (Penn’s student newspaper)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Source: University of Pennsylvania Incident Information Page
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Source: The Daily Pennsylvanian
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Source: University of Pennsylvania Email Notification (Nov. 20, 2025)
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Source: Class-action lawsuit filings (consolidation petitioned on Nov. 17, 2025)
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: WPVI (6abc Action News), and Source: University of Pennsylvania Breach Notification, and Source: The Triangle (Drexel University)Date Accessed: 2025-10-31, and Source: The VergeDate Accessed: 2025-10-31, and Source: UPenn Public Statements (via email/media)Date Accessed: 2025-10-31, and Source: The VergeUrl: https://www.theverge.com, and Source: Daily Pennsylvanian (Penn’s student newspaper)Url: https://www.thedp.com, and Source: University of Pennsylvania Incident Information Page, and Source: The Daily Pennsylvanian, and Source: University of Pennsylvania Email Notification (Nov. 20, 2025), and Source: Class-action lawsuit filings (consolidation petitioned on Nov. 17, 2025).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : data breach PEN2992729110625
Investigation Status: ongoing (school is still determining what information was taken)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Investigation Status: Concluded (breach confirmed, systems secured)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Investigation Status: Ongoing (UPenn unable to confirm scope or full details)
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Investigation Status: Ongoing (forensic analysis incomplete; no timeline provided)
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Investigation Status: Ongoing (as of Nov. 2025, with lawsuits pending)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public disclosure, email notifications to affected parties, Email Notification To Affected Parties (Pending Confirmation), Public Statements Via Media, Public Information Page With Updates, Warnings About Phishing/Suspicious Emails, Advisories To Review Credit Reports And Activate Fraud Alerts, Email Notification Signed By Provost John Jackson Jr., Executive Vp Mark Dingfield, And Interim Cio Josh Beeman On Nov. 20, 2025, Public Webpage Advisories On Protective Measures and Media Statement To *The Daily Pennsylvanian* By Interim Cio Josh Beeman.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Customer Advisories: Emails sent to affected community members
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Stakeholder Advisories: Upenn Students Notified Via Email (Spoofed Initially, Legitimate Advisories Pending).
Customer Advisories: General warning about phishing emails; specific advisories expected post-investigation
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Stakeholder Advisories: Warnings About Phishing/Suspicious Emails, Advisories To Review Credit Reports And Activate Fraud Alerts.
Customer Advisories: Individuals to be notified once analysis is complete
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Stakeholder Advisories: Mandatory Training Deadline (Dec. 31, 2025) With Potential System Access Revocation For Non-Compliance, Advisories On Credit Monitoring, Fraud Alerts, And Vigilance Against Identity Theft.
Customer Advisories: Donors, alumni, and students advised to monitor credit reports and place fraud alertsCommunity warned about suspicious requests for personal information
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Emails sent to affected community members, Upenn Students Notified Via Email (Spoofed Initially, Legitimate Advisories Pending), General Warning About Phishing Emails; Specific Advisories Expected Post-Investigation, , Warnings About Phishing/Suspicious Emails, Advisories To Review Credit Reports And Activate Fraud Alerts, Individuals to be notified once analysis is complete, Mandatory Training Deadline (Dec. 31, 2025) With Potential System Access Revocation For Non-Compliance, Advisories On Credit Monitoring, Fraud Alerts, And Vigilance Against Identity Theft, Donors, Alumni, And Students Advised To Monitor Credit Reports And Place Fraud Alerts, Community Warned About Suspicious Requests For Personal Information and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : data breach PEN2992729110625
Entry Point: Stolen Credentials,
High Value Targets: Development And Alumni Activity Systems,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Development And Alumni Activity Systems,
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Entry Point: Social Engineering (phishing emails)
High Value Targets: Development And Alumni Systems,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Development And Alumni Systems,
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Entry Point: PennKey (compromised credentials via social engineering)
Backdoors Established: ['Persistent access to Salesforce Marketing Cloud (implied by valid session during email spoofing)']
High Value Targets: Ultra-High-Net-Worth Donors, Former President Joe Biden, Historical Records (1920S Data),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Ultra-High-Net-Worth Donors, Former President Joe Biden, Historical Records (1920S Data),
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Entry Point: Social engineering (identity impersonation)
High Value Targets: Donor Data, Financial Records, Personal Information Of High-Profile Individuals (E.G., Joe Biden’S Granddaughter),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Donor Data, Financial Records, Personal Information Of High-Profile Individuals (E.G., Joe Biden’S Granddaughter),
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Entry Point: Stolen credentials via social engineering (identity impersonation)
High Value Targets: Development And Alumni Systems, Donor/Alumni/Student Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Development And Alumni Systems, Donor/Alumni/Student Data,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PEN3732337111225
Root Causes: Lack Of Mfa, Successful Social Engineering Attack,
Corrective Actions: System Lockdown, Public Disclosure,
Incident : Data Breach PEN3792837111425
Root Causes: Poor Cybersecurity Hygiene (E.G., Lack Of Mfa, Decentralized It), Successful Social Engineering (Pennkey Compromise), Inadequate Monitoring Of Cloud Platforms (Salesforce Marketing Cloud), Political/Cultural Tensions Exploited (E.G., Derogatory Email Content),
Corrective Actions: Upenn Likely To Overhaul Identity Management (E.G., Pennkey Protections)., Drexel Reviewing Security Controls To Prevent Similar Incidents., Increased Emphasis On Critical Thinking Training For Phishing (E.G., Drexel'S Dust Program).,
Incident : Data Breach PEN3202032111825
Root Causes: Successful social engineering attack exploiting human error
Incident : Data Breach PEN4562145112125
Root Causes: Successful Social Engineering Attack Leading To Credential Theft, Inadequate Protection Of Sensitive Personal Data, Delayed Notification To Affected Individuals,
Corrective Actions: Mandatory Cybersecurity Training For All Employees, Public Advisories On Protective Measures (E.G., Credit Monitoring), Legal Defense Against Class-Action Lawsuits,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Likely (Implied By Ongoing Investigation), .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: System Lockdown, Public Disclosure, , Upenn Likely To Overhaul Identity Management (E.G., Pennkey Protections)., Drexel Reviewing Security Controls To Prevent Similar Incidents., Increased Emphasis On Critical Thinking Training For Phishing (E.G., Drexel'S Dust Program)., , Mandatory Cybersecurity Training For All Employees, Public Advisories On Protective Measures (E.G., Credit Monitoring), Legal Defense Against Class-Action Lawsuits, .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Unknown (self-described financially motivated hackers)Claimed affiliation: None and Anonymous hacker (self-claimed).
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2023-10-31.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-11-20.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Banking Details, , Personal Data (birthdates, names, etc.), Donor Information, Potential FERPA Violations (student records), , , Internal University files, Donor data, Alumni data, Student data and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was development systemsalumni activity systems and Development and Alumni Activity Systems and Salesforce Marketing CloudUPenn Email System (spoofed Graduate School of Education account) and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) - SalesforceFile repositories - SharePointFile repositories - BoxReporting application - QlikviewMarketing Cloud and Systems supporting Penn’s development and alumni activities.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Locked down affected systems, Investigation into Salesforce Marketing Cloud AccessEmail Spoofing Mitigation and Breach contained (as stated by Penn).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal Data (birthdates, names, etc.), Banking Details, Donor Information, Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Student data, Donor data, Alumni data, Potential FERPA Violations (student records) and Internal University files.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 3.6M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was class-action lawsuit filed, , 14+ proposed class-action lawsuits (federal/state courts), Multiple class-action lawsuits filed (petitioned for consolidation on Nov. 17, 2025), Plaintiffs allege failure to protect sensitive data and untimely notification, .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Critical role of mandatory cybersecurity training in mitigating human vulnerabilities.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Enhance employee and student training on phishing/social engineering (e.g., UPenn's DUST program)., Monitor dark web for leaked credentials or data sales., Enable MFA for all user accounts, Improve incident response timelines for forensic investigations, Monitor for unauthorized access attempts, Proactive communication with stakeholders during breaches, Strengthen monitoring for suspicious login attempts using stolen credentials, Implement stricter multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, especially cloud platforms like Salesforce., Enhance multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all systems, Conduct regular third-party security audits., Implement continuous phishing simulation exercises for employees, Establish clearer protocols for timely breach disclosure and stakeholder communication, Regular audits of third-party systems (e.g., Salesforce, SharePoint, Box), Conduct regular security awareness training, Enhance social engineering defenses (e.g., employee training, multi-factor authentication) and Centralize cybersecurity governance to improve coordination..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are University of Pennsylvania Incident Information Page, University of Pennsylvania Email Notification (Nov. 20, 2025), The Triangle (Drexel University), The Verge, WPVI (6abc Action News), UPenn Public Statements (via email/media), The Daily Pennsylvanian, Daily Pennsylvanian (Penn’s student newspaper), University of Pennsylvania Breach Notification, Class-action lawsuit filings (consolidation petitioned on Nov. 17 and 2025).
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.theverge.com, https://www.thedp.com .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is ongoing (school is still determining what information was taken).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was UPenn students notified via email (spoofed initially, legitimate advisories pending), Warnings about phishing/suspicious emails, Advisories to review credit reports and activate fraud alerts, Mandatory training deadline (Dec. 31, 2025) with potential system access revocation for non-compliance, Advisories on credit monitoring, fraud alerts, and vigilance against identity theft, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Emails sent to affected community members, General warning about phishing emails; specific advisories expected post-investigation, Individuals to be notified once analysis is complete, Donors, alumni and and students advised to monitor credit reports and place fraud alertsCommunity warned about suspicious requests for personal information.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Social Engineering (phishing emails), Stolen credentials via social engineering (identity impersonation), PennKey (compromised credentials via social engineering) and Social engineering (identity impersonation).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Lack of MFASuccessful social engineering attack, Poor cybersecurity hygiene (e.g., lack of MFA, decentralized IT)Successful social engineering (PennKey compromise)Inadequate monitoring of cloud platforms (Salesforce Marketing Cloud)Political/cultural tensions exploited (e.g., derogatory email content), Successful social engineering attack exploiting human error, Successful social engineering attack leading to credential theftInadequate protection of sensitive personal dataDelayed notification to affected individuals.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was System lockdownPublic disclosure, UPenn likely to overhaul identity management (e.g., PennKey protections).Drexel reviewing security controls to prevent similar incidents.Increased emphasis on critical thinking training for phishing (e.g., Drexel's DUST program)., Mandatory cybersecurity training for all employeesPublic advisories on protective measures (e.g., credit monitoring)Legal defense against class-action lawsuits.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.
Description
An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.
Description
Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=penn-admissions' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
