Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Pellenc America, Inc. » PEL1774340749

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PEL1774340749)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-107
Company Score Before Incident743 / 1000
Company Score After Incident636 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPEL1774340749
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORVPN/RDP gateways, Exposed SSH servers, Stolen credentials
DATA EXPOSED228 GB of data threatened...
INCIDENT DATE22/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Pellenc America, Inc.'s Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Pellenc America, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Pellenc America, Inc. breach identified under incident ID PEL1774340749.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Pellenc America, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pellenc-america-inc., the number of followers: 871, the industry type: Machinery Manufacturing and the number of employees: 14 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 743 and after the incident was 636 with a difference of -107 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Pellenc America, Inc. and their customers.

Pellenc recently reported "ALP-001: From Access Broker to Extortion - New Tor-Based Threat Emerges", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A newly identified Tor-based leak site, ALP-001, marks a shift in cybercriminal tactics, transitioning from selling network access to direct extortion.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting VPN/RDP gateways (Fortinet, Cisco, Citrix RDWeb, Palo Alto GlobalProtect) and SSH servers, and exposing 228 GB of data threatened to be leaked.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating vPN/RDP gateways (Fortinet, Cisco, Citrix RDWeb, Palo Alto GlobalProtect), Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating stolen credentials (via brute force, infostealer logs), and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unpatched vulnerabilities in perimeter technologies. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create Account (T1136) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating creating admin accounts or backdoor VPN profiles and Account Manipulation (T1098) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating backdoor VPN profiles established for persistence. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating stolen credentials (via brute force) and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating infostealer logs used for credential access. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 228 GB of data threatened to be leaked. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating threatened data exfiltration (228 GB). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware-style extortion tactics mentioned and Financial Theft (T1657) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating motivation such as Financial gain (extortion). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating backdoor VPN profiles for evasion. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
External Remote Services (90%)
Valid Accounts (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Persistence
Create Account (90%)
Account Manipulation (80%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (90%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Financial Theft (90%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (70%)

Sources & References