What is the official website of pct2ep by AdamsonJones ?

The official website of pct2ep by AdamsonJones is https://www.adamson-jones.co.uk/pct2ep.

What is pct2ep by AdamsonJones's cybersecurity risk score?

pct2ep by AdamsonJones has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 768 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has pct2ep by AdamsonJones experienced?

According to Rankiteo, pct2ep by AdamsonJones currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has pct2ep by AdamsonJones been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, pct2ep by AdamsonJones has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, pct2ep by AdamsonJones is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, pct2ep by AdamsonJones does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, pct2ep by AdamsonJones is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, pct2ep by AdamsonJones does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, pct2ep by AdamsonJones is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,pct2ep by AdamsonJones is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does pct2ep by AdamsonJones operate in ?

pct2ep by AdamsonJones operates primarily in the Legal Services industry.

How many employees does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have ?

pct2ep by AdamsonJones employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones own any subsidiaries ?

pct2ep by AdamsonJones presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have ?

pct2ep by AdamsonJones's official LinkedIn profile has approximately followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for pct2ep by AdamsonJones ?

pct2ep by AdamsonJones is classified under the NAICS code 5411, which corresponds to Legal Services.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, pct2ep by AdamsonJones does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, pct2ep by AdamsonJones maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pct2ep.

How many cybersecurity incidents has pct2ep by AdamsonJones experienced ?

As of September 9, 2026, Rankiteo reports that pct2ep by AdamsonJones has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does pct2ep by AdamsonJones have ?

pct2ep by AdamsonJones has an estimated 8,018 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has pct2ep by AdamsonJones faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

768

/1000

Fair

793

/1000

Fair

pct2ep by AdamsonJones Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

adamson-jones.co.uk

Add Your Compliance Badge

AdamsonJones brings you pct2ep - a dedicated resource for overseas associates seeking reliable and efficient European regional phase entry by experienced European Patent Attorneys. A cost estimate for your application can be obtained immediately via our online cost estimator, and your application processed within 48 hours on receipt of your instructions. With pct2ep you have access to all the information you need regarding European patent applications, including useful tips and advice on procedure and costs for each stage of the process.

pct2ep by AdamsonJones CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

pct2ep by AdamsonJo...

Breach

06/2021

GAT211621124

Loading…

A.I.

PA Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for PA

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for pct2ep by AdamsonJones in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for pct2ep by AdamsonJones in 2026.

Incident Types PA vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for pct2ep by AdamsonJones in 2026.

Incident History - PA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

pct2ep by AdamsonJones Subsidiaries

PA

Legal Services

Website: https://www.adamson-jones.co.uk/pct2ep

Company Size: 11-50 employees

GateleyProfessional Services

Gateley LegalLaw Practice

Kiddy & PartnersBusiness Consulting and Services

Gateley VindenConstruction

Gateley HamerReal Estate

Gateley GlobalBusiness Consulting and Services

Gateley Legal NILaw Practice

Gateley CapitusReal Estate

EntrustFinancial Services

Adamson Jones part of GateleyLaw Practice

Loading…

pct2ep by AdamsonJones Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

pct2ep by AdamsonJones CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-86564

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in DPDK lib/vhost. Missing length validation before reading command_data in the virtio-net control-queue handler can cause an out-of-bounds read and a host process crash.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55250

SUMMARY

Maravel, a PHP framework oriented towards dependency injection, prior to version 10.74.0 has a high-severity Token Replay Vulnerability arising from a structural lifecycle mismatch between stateless token validation engines and high-performance relational caching layers. Any application with low cache memory that causes premature eviction to free up memory and applications running macropay-solutions/maravel-framework that utilize tymon/jwt-auth for API token authentication and blacklist management or any other package that does the same may be affected. This architectural risk might also impact native Laravel applications utilizing cache tags under specific volatile or eviction-capped environments. tymon/jwt-auth automatically probes for cache tag support. If found, it forcefully wraps 14-day token blacklist entries (jti) inside a relational tymon.jwt tag. In environments where the O(1) Atomic Lazy Eviction model is active — either natively inside Maravel-Framework v20.x or manually backported into v10.x via the explicit DI container singletons provided in PR #104 (App\Cache\TaggedCache and App\Cache\TagSet) — a strict global tracking ceiling (Container::TAGGED_CACHE_TTL_CAP_SECONDS) of 7,200 seconds (2 hours) is enforced to secure the system against memory index bloat. This ceiling forcefully truncates the 14-day blacklist lifespan down to a maximum of 2 hours, after which individual tracking keys naturally expire and disappear from the active cache window. Furthermore, because the optimized engine implements a generational version matrix to achieve O(1) flush speeds, any programmatic or manual invocation of a tag flush or reset (e.g., Cache::tags([...])->flush()) instantly bumps the internal atomic master version pointer. This shifts the computed cryptographic composite hash (sha1($this->tags->getNamespace())) for all overlapping components, rendering the entire existing index immediately unreachable. Consequently, through either natural 2-hour expiration or an intervening tag flush execution (like the cache naturally cleaning old values to free up memory), the invalidation state records are entirely wiped out. Because the tokens' physical cryptographic signatures remain structurally valid for up to 14 days, stolen, hijacked, or legitimately logged-out tokens are instantly and silently resurrected across the entire API gateway, leaving the application critically vulnerable to widespread Token Replay Attacks. Because this issue is caused by an upstream architectural assumption within the tymon/jwt-auth package rather than a core defect inside the framework, there is no direct framework version upgrade that can safely bypass this lifecycle collision without breaking business cache recycling bounds. Maravel version 10.74.0 introduced a way to backport the new fixed tagged cache from 20.x into 10.x by resolving TagSet and TaggedCache from DI, which is how this latent architectural lifecycle vulnerability was discovered. Users must apply the decoupled configuration workaround outlined below. As a workaround, make sure that cache memory size does not generate early natural evictions from cache to free up space, deleting blacklisted jwt ids before they expire. Applications must decouple flat authentication vectors from the relational tagging subsystem. This forces token identifiers to write directly to the primary cache keyspace as flat, un-tagged key-value pairs where they securely retain their unclipped 14-day lifecycle.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-53639

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-mr9r-h354-966r

CVE-2026-53638

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, an authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the shop account API. The `PATCH /api/v2/shop/account/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}` endpoint, used by an authenticated shop customer to change the payment method of an order that has been placed but not yet paid (state `STATE_NEW`), does not validate that the chosen payment method is enabled for the order's channel. The equivalent checkout endpoint (`PATCH /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}`) correctly rejects out-of-channel payment methods with `HTTP 422`; the account endpoint silently accepts them and returns `HTTP 200`. An authenticated customer can therefore assign any globally enabled payment method to their own placed order, including methods that the store operator has explicitly excluded from that channel. The issue is fixed in versions: 2.0.18, 2.1.15, 2.2.6 and above. As a workaround, decorate the `Sylius\Bundle\ApiBundle\Changer\PaymentMethodChangerInterface` service in the application.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-6955-hrm5-c4qp

CVE-2026-53637

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.17, 2.1.0 through 2.1.14, and 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 contain an improper workflow enforcement vulnerability in the cart `FormComponent`. When an order is completed while its cart page remains open, the stale LiveComponent does not detect the order’s changed state and continues to permit cart actions, allowing an authenticated customer to modify or permanently delete an already completed order. Versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6 contain a patch. As a workaround, deployments can copy the patched `FormComponent` into the application's `src/` directory and override the `sylius_shop.twig.component.cart.form` service definition to use that class.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-5597-7rmh-97q5

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

pct2ep by AdamsonJones Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

PA A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

pct2ep by AdamsonJones CyberSecurity News & History

PA Company Scoring based on AI Models