Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Patriot Communications » PAT1775104634

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PAT1775104634)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-13
Company Score Before Incident808 / 1000
Company Score After Incident795 / 1000
Company LinkView Patriot Communications Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERPAT1775104634
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNo evidence of compromised private...
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Patriot Communications's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Patriot Communications Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Patriot Communications breach identified under incident ID PAT1775104634.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Patriot Communications's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/patriot-communications, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 21 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 808 and after the incident was 795 with a difference of -13 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Patriot Communications and their customers.

On 31 March 2026, Patriot Regional Emergency Communications Center (PRECC) disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Cyberattack Disrupts Emergency Communications for Multiple Massachusetts Towns".

A cyberattack targeting the Patriot Regional Emergency Communications Center (PRECC) has disrupted non-emergency and business phone lines for public safety departments across several Massachusetts towns.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Non-emergency and business phone lines for public safety departments, and exposing No evidence of compromised private user data.

In response, while recovery efforts such as Restoring services continue, and stakeholders are being briefed through Advising residents to use 978-433-2671 for non-emergency inquiries.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Residents in affected towns are advised to use 978-433-2671 for non-emergency inquiries, while 911 remains the primary contact for emergencies.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack targeting the Patriot Regional Emergency Communications Center and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted non-emergency and business phone lines for public safety departments. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted non-emergency and business phone lines...affected police, fire, and EMS departments and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating townsend reported a brief outage before restoring its lines. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating dunstable proactively disabled its system connections with PRECC and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating non-emergency and business phone lines for public safety departments remain offline. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating affected the police, fire, and EMS departments in Pepperell, Dunstable, Townsend, Ashby, and Groton. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (90%)
Defacement (30%)
Defense Evasion
Disabling Security Tools (50%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (40%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (60%)

Sources & References