Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Patina Restaurant GroupPatina Restaurant Group
VS
Burger KingBurger King
Patina Restaurant Group

Patina Restaurant Group

N/A

Last Update: 05/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.patinagroup.com
766/1000Fair

Founded in 1989 by esteemed Chef Joachim Splichal with its inaugural restaurant on Melrose Avenue, Patina Restaurant Group has consistently embodied excellence and creativity. Originating in Los Angeles, we were built on the conviction that culinary mastery is an art fo...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:761
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Burger King

Burger King

5505 Blue Lagoon Drive, Miami, FL, US, 33126

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bk.com
750/1000Fair

The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its f...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:127,892
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Patina Restaurant Group

Patina Restaurant Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burger King

Burger King

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patina Restaurant Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Patina Restaurant Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patina Restaurant Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burger King (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burger King cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Patina Restaurant Group

Patina Restaurant Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Burger King

Burger King

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MCD344071125
🔒 Incident : Breach
BUR1790000683
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
BUR22818923

FAQ

Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group company and Burger King company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group and Burger King, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group and Burger King, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Patina Restaurant Group or Burger King ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Patina Restaurant Group or Burger King ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group and Burger King, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Patina Restaurant Group and Burger King, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3