Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ParnasseParnasse
VS
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
Parnasse

Parnasse

FR

Last Update: 07/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.parnasse.fr
754/1000Fair

Parnasse, la marque sélective d'Orange délivre l'excellence d'un service numérique ultra-personnalisé et haut de gamme à votre domicile, en déplacement ou au bureau, pour répondre aux attentes d’une clientèle exigeante. Chacun des Membres Parnasse accède à des services...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:211
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Avenida Eng. Luís Carlos Berrini, 1376, São Paulo, 04571 - 000, BR

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vivo.com.br
793/1000Fair

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is part of the Telefónica Group and with more than 94 million customers, of which 75 million mobile and 19 million fixed, we are the largest telecommunications company in Brazil, with nationwide presence and a complete, convergent portfolio of p...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:38,994
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Parnasse

Parnasse

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Parnasse in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Parnasse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Parnasse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Parnasse

Parnasse

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Parnasse company and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Parnasse and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Parnasse and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Parnasse or Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Parnasse or Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) ?
Between Parnasse and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Parnasse and Vivo (Telefônica Brasil), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8