What is the official website of PA Large Storage ?

The official website of PA Large Storage is http://www.palargestorage.com.

What is PA Large Storage's cybersecurity risk score?

PA Large Storage has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 759 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has PA Large Storage experienced?

According to Rankiteo, PA Large Storage currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has PA Large Storage been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, PA Large Storage has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does PA Large Storage have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, PA Large Storage is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does PA Large Storage have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, PA Large Storage does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does PA Large Storage comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, PA Large Storage is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does PA Large Storage have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, PA Large Storage does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does PA Large Storage comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, PA Large Storage is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does PA Large Storage have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,PA Large Storage is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does PA Large Storage operate in ?

PA Large Storage operates primarily in the Warehousing industry.

How many employees does PA Large Storage have ?

PA Large Storage employs approximately 2 people worldwide.

Does PA Large Storage own any subsidiaries ?

PA Large Storage presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does PA Large Storage have ?

PA Large Storage's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 11 followers.

Does PA Large Storage have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, PA Large Storage does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does PA Large Storage have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, PA Large Storage maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pa-large-storage.

How many cybersecurity incidents has PA Large Storage experienced ?

As of September 13, 2026, Rankiteo reports that PA Large Storage has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does PA Large Storage have ?

PA Large Storage has an estimated 169 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

PLS

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

759

/1000

Fair

784

/1000

Fair

PA Large Storage Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

palargestorage.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

We are a family-owned business conveniently located in Middletown, PA near the Harrisburg International Airport and Penn State Harrisburg. All units are self storage. PA Large Storage has large bays available to store your RV, motor home or camper, boat, antique or classic cars inside. The storage units are not limited to recreational vehicles. We can store warehouse items, household goods and seasonal equipment. Our individual units are equipped with 20 AMP GFCI receptacle and lights that turn on automatically for your convenience. Charging batteries is no problem.

PLS

PA Large Storage CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

PLS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for PLS

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PA Large Storage in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PA Large Storage in 2026.

Incident Types PLS vs Warehousing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PA Large Storage in 2026.

Incident History - PLS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

PA Large Storage Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PLS

Warehousing

Website: http://www.palargestorage.com

Company Size: 2

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

PA Large Storage Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

PA Large Storage CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 15, 2026 08:00 AM

StoneFly AI Expansion in 2026 Across Storage, Cybersecurity, Backup and DR, and Cloud

CASTRO VALLEY, CA, UNITED STATES, January 15, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — StoneFly, Inc. (www.iscsi.com), the original innovator of the iSCSI storage protocol...

Read Article

January 06, 2026 08:00 AM

Cybercrime risks at 2026 Pennsylvania Farm Show

HARRISBURG, Pa. — The Cybersecurity Association of Pennsylvania (PennCyber) on Tuesday issued a warning ahead of the upcoming Pennsylvania...

Read Article

January 05, 2026 08:00 AM

Datavault AI and Available Infrastructure to Scale Physical Private Edge Cloud to Deliver Powerful Zero Trust Cybersecurity, Digital Twin and Agentic Data Monetization to 100 U.S. Cities in 2026

Partnership pairs Datavault AI's patented DataValue®, DataScore® and Information Data Exchange® (IDE®) solutions with Available...

Read Article

January 04, 2026 08:00 AM

Healthcare Data Breach Statistics

In 2023, 725 data breaches were reported to OCR and across those breaches, more than 133 million records were exposed or impermissibly disclosed.

Read Article

March 28, 2025 07:00 AM

Fortinet vs Palo Alto NGFWs: Comparison Guide

Compare Fortinet vs Palo Alto on pricing, security, and performance to find the best firewall for your needs. Get key insights and...

Read Article

February 21, 2025 08:00 AM

Ranking the Top 10 High-Paying Tech Jobs in Pittsburgh in 2025

In 2025, Pittsburgh's booming tech scene offers high-paying job opportunities. Top tech roles, like Cloud Architects and Data Scientists,...

Read Article

February 12, 2025 08:00 AM

Pittsburgh Cybersecurity Job Market: Trends and Growth Areas for 2025

Explore Pittsburgh's 2025 cybersecurity job market trends and growth areas. Discover opportunities and challenges in Pennsylvania, US.

Read Article

February 01, 2025 08:00 AM

Cyber Safety: Why and How Pallet Businesses Should Shore up their Cybersecurity Measures

According to data from the Identity Theft Resource Center, 353027892 people were victims of data compromise in 2023.

Read Article

December 26, 2024 08:00 AM

Top Cybersecurity Employers in Pittsburgh: Who's Hiring and What They Look For

Pittsburgh's cybersecurity landscape is booming with top employers like Google, Uber, the U.S. Department of Defense, and Proofpoint driving...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-90647

SUMMARY

ASE/Kalkitech ASE2000 V2 Communication Test Set 2.35 through 2.37 on Windows contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in the IEC 60870-5-104 TLS client (Task Mode). This allows a network-positioned attacker to bypass certificate validation via a certificate with multiple simultaneous faults, enabling a Man-in-the-Middle attack on protected communications.

Published

Date2026-09-12

Updated

Date2026-09-12

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.4

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 9.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

https://www.ase-systems.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CYB_2026_86278_Advisory_v1.0.pdf

CVE-2026-90487

SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.4.2. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file xxl-job-admin/src/main/java/com/xxl/job/admin/business/controller/JobGroupController.java. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published

Date2026-09-12

Updated

Date2026-09-12

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss2

Base Score: 4.0

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 2.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-90486

SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in openstatusHQ openstatus up to f04c827112f30a11d571ebdad3892826034d6265. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file apps/status-page/src/lib/proxy/resolve-custom-domain-rewrite.ts. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. As a result, specific version information for affected or updated releases is not available. The identifier of the patch is 86f370c9c20074c3c3fdec53a359874b8e670fd4. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue. This issue got fixed with a silent patch.

Published

Date2026-09-12

Updated

Date2026-09-12

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)

cvss2

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-79300

SUMMARY

SEP sesam before 5.2.0.24 mishandles User Authorization with MFA. If AD authentication is configured and MFA is enforced, an attacker can create a second OTP access capability. SEP sesam and Active Directory handle username capitalization differently, which may allow multiple SEP sesam user accounts to be created for the same Active Directory (AD) account. Active Directory treats usernames as case-insensitive, while SEP sesam distinguishes between different letter casing. As a result, the same AD user can be represented by multiple SEP sesam user accounts that differ only in username capitalization. When Active Directory authentication is configured and multi-factor authentication (MFA) is enforced, this behavior may allow an additional OTP Authenticator to be registered for the same AD account, reducing the effectiveness of MFA protection.

Published

Date2026-09-12

Updated

Date2026-09-12

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

https://wiki.sep.de/wiki/index.php/Release_Notes_5.2.0_Artemis#fixed

CVE-2026-90485

SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in IOBit Uninstaller 15.5.0.11. Affected by this issue is the function sub_11838 of the file IURegistryFilter.sys of the component IOCTL Dispatch Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack requires local access. The exploit has been published and may be used. Identical IURegistryFilter.sys ships across multiple IObit families. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published

Date2026-09-12

Updated

Date2026-09-12

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

cvss2

Base Score: 4.6

Complexity: LOW

AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C

cvss3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

PA Large Storage Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

PLS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

PA Large Storage CyberSecurity News & History

PLS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for PLS

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types PLS vs Warehousing Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - PLS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PA Large Storage Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PLS

PA Large Storage Similar Companies

PA Large Storage CyberSecurity News

StoneFly AI Expansion in 2026 Across Storage, Cybersecurity, Backup and DR, and Cloud

Cybercrime risks at 2026 Pennsylvania Farm Show

Datavault AI and Available Infrastructure to Scale Physical Private Edge Cloud to Deliver Powerful Zero Trust Cybersecurity, Digital Twin and Agentic Data Monetization to 100 U.S. Cities in 2026

Healthcare Data Breach Statistics

Fortinet vs Palo Alto NGFWs: Comparison Guide

Ranking the Top 10 High-Paying Tech Jobs in Pittsburgh in 2025

Pittsburgh Cybersecurity Job Market: Trends and Growth Areas for 2025

Cyber Safety: Why and How Pallet Businesses Should Shore up their Cybersecurity Measures

Top Cybersecurity Employers in Pittsburgh: Who's Hiring and What They Look For

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

PA Large Storage CyberSecurity News & History

PLS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for PLS

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types PLS vs Warehousing Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - PLS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PA Large Storage Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PLS

PA Large Storage Similar Companies

PA Large Storage CyberSecurity News

StoneFly AI Expansion in 2026 Across Storage, Cybersecurity, Backup and DR, and Cloud

Cybercrime risks at 2026 Pennsylvania Farm Show

Datavault AI and Available Infrastructure to Scale Physical Private Edge Cloud to Deliver Powerful Zero Trust Cybersecurity, Digital Twin and Agentic Data Monetization to 100 U.S. Cities in 2026

Healthcare Data Breach Statistics

Fortinet vs Palo Alto NGFWs: Comparison Guide

Ranking the Top 10 High-Paying Tech Jobs in Pittsburgh in 2025

Pittsburgh Cybersecurity Job Market: Trends and Growth Areas for 2025

Cyber Safety: Why and How Pallet Businesses Should Shore up their Cybersecurity Measures

Top Cybersecurity Employers in Pittsburgh: Who's Hiring and What They Look For

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo