Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (OWA1776861154)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of OWASP CRS's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts OWASP CRS Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the OWASP CRS breach identified under incident ID OWA1776861154.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of OWASP CRS's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/owasp-crs, the number of followers: 461, the industry type: Technology, Information and Internet and the number of employees: 5 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 744 with a difference of -4 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on OWASP CRS and their customers.
On 01 January 2026, Progress Software disclosed vulnerability, WAF bypass and remote code execution issues under the banner "Progress Software Patches Critical Vulnerabilities in MOVEit WAF and LoadMaster".
Progress Software has addressed multiple high-severity vulnerabilities in its MOVEit WAF and LoadMaster products, including a flaw that could allow attackers to bypass web application firewall (WAF) protections.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting MOVEit WAF, LoadMaster and ECS Connection Manager.
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like patches released, and began remediation that includes upgrades to fixed versions, and stakeholders are being briefed through urged customers to upgrade immediately.
The case underscores how completed, teams are taking away lessons such as The incident underscores ongoing risks in WAF rule development and the potential for evasion techniques in security controls, and recommending next steps like Upgrade to the latest patched versions of MOVEit WAF and LoadMaster immediately, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Progress Software urged customers to upgrade immediately. MOVEit Cloud environments have already been patched.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating flaw that could allow attackers to bypass web application firewall (WAF) protections and Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating four OS command injection flaws enabling remote code execution by authenticated attackers. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating oS command injection flaws (CVE-2026-3517, CVE-2026-3518, CVE-2026-3519, CVE-2026-4048). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating cVE-2026-21876 permits unauthenticated attackers to bypass detection via crafted HTTP multipart requests and Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating wAF bypass vulnerability in OWASP Core Rule Set (CRS). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating oS command injection flaws enabling remote code execution by authenticated attackers. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- OWASP CRS Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/owasp-crs/incident/OWA1776861154
- OWASP CRS CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/owasp-crs
- OWASP CRS Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/owa1776861154-owasp-vulnerability-january-2026/
- OWASP CRS CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/owasp-crs/history
- OWASP CRS CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/04/22/progress-waf-bypass-cve-2026-21876/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf