What is the official website of Orkla Design ?

The official website of Orkla Design is http://www.orkladesign.no.

What is Orkla Design's cybersecurity risk score?

Orkla Design has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 813 out of 1000, indicating a Good security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Orkla Design experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Orkla Design currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Orkla Design been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Orkla Design has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Orkla Design have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Orkla Design is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Orkla Design have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Orkla Design does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Orkla Design comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Orkla Design is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Orkla Design have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Orkla Design does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Orkla Design comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Orkla Design is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Orkla Design have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Orkla Design is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Orkla Design operate in ?

Orkla Design operates primarily in the Graphic Design industry.

How many employees does Orkla Design have ?

Orkla Design employs approximately 11-50 employees people worldwide.

Does Orkla Design own any subsidiaries ?

Orkla Design presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Orkla Design have ?

Orkla Design's official LinkedIn profile has approximately followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Orkla Design ?

Orkla Design is classified under the NAICS code 54143, which corresponds to Graphic Design Services.

Does Orkla Design have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Orkla Design does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Orkla Design have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Orkla Design maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/orkla-design.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Orkla Design experienced ?

As of July 12, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Orkla Design has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Orkla Design have ?

Orkla Design has an estimated 2,686 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Orkla Design

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

813

/1000

Good

838

/1000

Good

Orkla Design Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

orkladesign.no

Add Your Compliance Badge

Orkla Design was established in January 2016. Historically the company has existed since 1997 under the name Ikon Designbyrå. We have 20 years of experience with graphic design services for companies in Orkla.

Orkla Design A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Orkla Design

Orkla Design CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

Orkla Design Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Orkla Design

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orkla Design in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orkla Design in 2026.

Incident Types Orkla Design vs Graphic Design Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orkla Design in 2026.

Incident History - Orkla Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Orkla Design Subsidiaries

Orkla Design

Graphic Design

Website: http://www.orkladesign.no

Company Size: 11-50 employees

Orkla ASAInvestment Management

Orkla SverigeManufacturing

Orkla FoodSolutions SverigeMat- och dryckesservering

Orkla HealthRetail

Orkla Health NorgeDetaljhandel

KiMs A/SManufacturing

LilleborgRetail Office Equipment

Pierre Robert GroupTextile Manufacturing

Orkla Home & Personal CareManufacturing

Riemann A/S (a Part of Orkla Health)Personal Care Product Manufacturing

Orkla Savoury TasteFood and Beverage Manufacturing

Orkla SnacksProduksjon av mat og drikke

Orkla Snacks Norge ASManufacturing

Orkla SnacksFood and Beverage Manufacturing

Orkla LatvijaFood and Beverage Services

Orkla EestiFood & Beverages

Noi SiriusManufacturing

MARGIRIS UABFood Production

Tredo ABMarketing Services

Harris BrushesManufacturing

Orkla Food Ingredients ASFood and Beverage Manufacturing

Loading…

Orkla Design Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Orkla Design CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-58281

SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.3

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281

CVE-2026-10660

SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.4

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.7

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61870

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)

cvss3

Base Score: 2.9

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.4

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61861

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-61858

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

Published

Date2026-07-11

Updated

Date2026-07-11

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

cvss4

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…