Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Oregon Department of CorrectionsOregon Department of Corrections
VS
TÜV Rheinland GroupTÜV Rheinland Group
Oregon Department of Corrections

Oregon Department of Corrections

2575 Center St. NE, Salem, 97301, US

Last Update: 30/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.oregon.gov/DOC
677/1000Weak

The mission of the Oregon Department of Corrections (DOC) is to protect communities, promote accountability, and transform lives. The Oregon Department of Corrections is committed to protecting public safety, holding individuals accountable, and instilling personal res...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:1,028
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

Am Grauen Stein, Cologne, 51105, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.tuv.com/impressum
726/1000Moderate

Neutral, independent third party For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for ensuring quality, safety, and efficiency in conjunction with people, the environment, and technology. As a neutral, independent third party, we test, accompany, develop, promote and ...

NAICS:92219
NAICS Definition:Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities
Employees:17,587
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Oregon Department of Corrections

Oregon Department of Corrections

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

Oregon Department of Corrections has 34.64% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Oregon Department of Corrections (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oregon Department of Corrections cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TÜV Rheinland Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TÜV Rheinland Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Oregon Department of Corrections

Oregon Department of Corrections

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ORE1780107920
TÜV Rheinland Group

TÜV Rheinland Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TUV1765188618

FAQ

Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections company and TÜV Rheinland Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Oregon Department of Corrections or TÜV Rheinland Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Oregon Department of Corrections or TÜV Rheinland Group ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Oregon Department of Corrections and TÜV Rheinland Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA