TRG
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
tuv-rheinland-group
Website:
Employees number:
17,587
Number of followers:
200,000
NAICS:
92219
Industry Type:
Homepage:
tuv.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
TÜV_1326677
Scan Status:
In-progress
TÜV Rheinland Group Company CyberSecurity Posture
tuv.com
Neutral, independent third party For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for ensuring quality, safety, and efficiency in conjunction with people, the environment, and technology. As a neutral, independent third party, we test, accompany, develop, promote and certify products, plants, processes and management systems as well as services based on legal requirements and other relevant performance benchmarks and standards. In addition, TÜV Rheinland qualifies specialists and trains people for numerous companies and areas of business and life. Using knowledge meaningfully Our greatest capital is based on over 20,000 clever minds: concentrated knowledge. It is our enormous pool of experience from which the people at TÜV Rheinland create exceptional substance and inspiration for their meaningful work. The results of their work can be discovered everywhere: in tested elevators or rides, on certified toys or technical equipment, in our advice or training. No matter where - our international teams have been setting standards in terms of safety, quality and efficiency for many years.
TÜV Rheinland Group A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
TRG Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
TRG
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
TRG Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
TRG
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
TRG Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
TÜV Rheinland Group: South Korea to tighten data-security certification standards, add post-breach audits
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: ( December 8, 2025, 04:42 GMT | Official Statement) -- MLex Summary: South Korea is preparing to overhaul its information-security and privacy certification regime for companies holding large volumes of personal data, following a string of high-profile breaches at certified firms. The changes, led by the Ministry of Science and ICT and the Personal Information Protection Commission, would in effect make ISMS-P certification mandatory for key personal-information systems at public bodies, telecom operators and online platforms, while tightening criteria for large platforms and other high-risk operators. Authorities plan to revamp audit methods, expand technical and on-site inspections, and allow certification to be denied or cancelled when serious deficiencies are detected. Companies hit by data breaches will face special follow-up audits, and about 900 ISMS-certified telecom and online-shopping operators have been told to run self-checks for security vulnerabilities ahead of the on-site inspections the government aims to complete by the first quarter of 2026.The statement is attached (in Korean).... Prepare for tomorrow’s regulatory change, today MLex identifies risk to business wherever it emerges, with specialist reporters across the globe providing exclusive news and deep-dive analysis on the proposals, probes, enforcement actions and rulings that matter to your organization and clients, now and in the longer term. Know what others in the room don’t, with features inclu
TRG Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for TRG
Incidents vs Public Safety Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Group in 2026.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Group in 2026.
Incident Types TRG vs Public Safety Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TÜV Rheinland Group in 2026.
Incident History — TRG (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TRG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
TRG Company Subsidiaries
Neutral, independent third party For more than 150 years, TÜV Rheinland has stood for ensuring quality, safety, and efficiency in conjunction with people, the environment, and technology. As a neutral, independent third party, we test, accompany, develop, promote and certify products, plants, processes and management systems as well as services based on legal requirements and other relevant performance benchmarks and standards. In addition, TÜV Rheinland qualifies specialists and trains people for numerous companies and areas of business and life. Using knowledge meaningfully Our greatest capital is based on over 20,000 clever minds: concentrated knowledge. It is our enormous pool of experience from which the people at TÜV Rheinland create exceptional substance and inspiration for their meaningful work. The results of their work can be discovered everywhere: in tested elevators or rides, on certified toys or technical equipment, in our advice or training. No matter where - our international teams have been setting standards in terms of safety, quality and efficiency for many years.
Loading...
TRG Similar Companies
DEKRA
For 100 years, DEKRA has been a trusted name in safety. Founded in 1925 with the original goal of improving road safety through vehicle inspections, DEKRA has grown to become the world's largest independent, non-listed expert organization in the field of testing, inspection, and certification. Today
TÜV SÜD
TÜV SÜD is the trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions. Our community of experts is passionate about technology and united by the belief that technology should better people’s lives. We work alongside our customers to anticipate and capitalize on technological d
DNV is the independent expert in risk management and assurance, operating in more than 100 countries. Through its broad experience and deep expertise DNV advances safety and sustainable performance, sets industry benchmarks, and inspires and invents solutions. Whether assessing a new ship design,
.png)
TRG CyberSecurity News
January 20, 2026 04:28 PM
AI Inspection Market Size, Share and Industry Analysis 2032
The AI Inspection Market is projected to grow from USD 33.07 billion in 2025 to USD 102.42 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 17.5% from 2025 to 2032.
December 08, 2025 08:00 AM
TÜV Rheinland strengthens industry confidence with advanced SmartRBI services for optimized asset integrity management
Data-Driven Risk Based Inspection Approach Helps Operators Enhance Safety, Reduce Costs, and Improve Reliability Across Complex Industrial...
December 05, 2025 08:00 AM
TÜV Rheinland Hong Kong Convenes First Comprehensive Coffee Machines & Appliances Summit
media[855673]**Advance Global Compliance in FCM, PFAS, and IoT Cybersecurity.
October 30, 2025 07:00 AM
Top 20 Voices in Automotive 2025 | Automotive IQ
Automotive IQ is proud to present the Top 20 Voices in Automotive 2025 - honouring the industry leaders driving innovation, progress,...
October 27, 2025 07:00 AM
Forum looks at strengthening cybersecurity collaboration
SAUD AL ANSARIMUSCAT: With broad participation from government and private sector entities, the Cyber Partnership Forum for Security...
September 26, 2025 07:00 AM
AiMOGA humanoid robot becomes first to achieve European certification
AiMOGA Robotics, a unit of Chery, has become the first company to secure CE-MD, CE-RED and EN 18031 certifications for its humanoid robot...
September 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Cyber Security in Robotics Market | Global Market Analysis Report - 2035
Cyber Security in Robotics Market was worth USD 4.7 billion in 2025, and is predicted to grow to USD 14.3 billion by 2035, with a CAGR of...
August 25, 2025 07:00 AM
Global certifications, a must for Indian firms to enhance security and access, says TÜV Rheinland CEO
Germany-headquartered TÜV Rheinland, a global provider of independent testing and certification, plans to expand its presence in the Indian...
August 25, 2025 07:00 AM
Cyber Threats Are the New Pest In Agriculture
By TÜV Rheinland --. The food and agriculture sectors are undergoing rapid digital transformation. Sensors, automated machinery, cloud...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
TRG CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of TÜV Rheinland Group
The official website of TÜV Rheinland Group is http://www.tuv.com/impressum.
TÜV Rheinland Group’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, TÜV Rheinland Group’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 722, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does TÜV Rheinland Group’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, TÜV Rheinland Group currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Has TÜV Rheinland Group been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?
According to Rankiteo, TÜV Rheinland Group has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
Does TÜV Rheinland Group have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, TÜV Rheinland Group is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does TÜV Rheinland Group have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, TÜV Rheinland Group does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does TÜV Rheinland Group comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, TÜV Rheinland Group is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does TÜV Rheinland Group have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, TÜV Rheinland Group does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does TÜV Rheinland Group comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, TÜV Rheinland Group is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does TÜV Rheinland Group have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,TÜV Rheinland Group is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of TÜV Rheinland Group
TÜV Rheinland Group operates primarily in the Public Safety industry.
Number of Employees at TÜV Rheinland Group
TÜV Rheinland Group employs approximately 17,587 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by TÜV Rheinland Group
TÜV Rheinland Group presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
TÜV Rheinland Group’s LinkedIn Followers
TÜV Rheinland Group’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 200,000 followers.
NAICS Classification of TÜV Rheinland Group
TÜV Rheinland Group is classified under the NAICS code 92219, which corresponds to Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities.
TÜV Rheinland Group’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, TÜV Rheinland Group does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
TÜV Rheinland Group’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, TÜV Rheinland Group maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/tuv-rheinland-group.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving TÜV Rheinland Group
As of January 24, 2026, Rankiteo reports that TÜV Rheinland Group has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
TÜV Rheinland Group has an estimated 2,093 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at TÜV Rheinland Group ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
How does TÜV Rheinland Group detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with revamped audit methods, expanded technical and on-site inspections, self-checks for security vulnerabilities, and communication strategy with official statement released..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: South Korea Overhauls Information-Security and Privacy Certification Regime Following High-Profile Breaches
Description: South Korea is preparing to overhaul its information-security and privacy certification regime for companies holding large volumes of personal data, following a string of high-profile breaches at certified firms. The changes, led by the Ministry of Science and ICT and the Personal Information Protection Commission, would make ISMS-P certification mandatory for key personal-information systems at public bodies, telecom operators, and online platforms, while tightening criteria for large platforms and other high-risk operators. Authorities plan to revamp audit methods, expand technical and on-site inspections, and allow certification to be denied or cancelled when serious deficiencies are detected. Companies hit by data breaches will face special follow-up audits, and about 900 ISMS-certified telecom and online-shopping operators have been told to run self-checks for security vulnerabilities ahead of on-site inspections.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-12-08
Type: Regulatory Overhaul
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Brand Reputation Impact: High
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Data.
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Entity Type: Public Bodies
Industry: Government
Location: South Korea
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Entity Type: Telecom Operators
Industry: Telecommunications
Location: South Korea
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Entity Type: Online Platforms
Industry: E-commerce/Technology
Location: South Korea
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Remediation Measures: Revamped audit methods, expanded technical and on-site inspections, self-checks for security vulnerabilities
Communication Strategy: Official statement released
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Type of Data Compromised: Personal Data
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Revamped audit methods, expanded technical and on-site inspections, self-checks for security vulnerabilities.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Regulatory Notifications: ISMS-P certification changes announced
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Lessons Learned: High-profile breaches at certified firms highlighted gaps in the existing certification regime, necessitating stricter oversight and mandatory compliance for high-risk operators.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Recommendations: Companies should prepare for stricter audits, self-assess security vulnerabilities, and ensure compliance with the new ISMS-P certification requirements to avoid denial or cancellation of certification.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are High-profile breaches at certified firms highlighted gaps in the existing certification regime, necessitating stricter oversight and mandatory compliance for high-risk operators.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Companies should prepare for stricter audits, self-assess security vulnerabilities and and ensure compliance with the new ISMS-P certification requirements to avoid denial or cancellation of certification..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: MLexDate Accessed: 2025-12-08.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Investigation Status: Ongoing (on-site inspections planned for Q1 2026)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Official statement released.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Stakeholder Advisories: Regulatory changes announced; affected entities advised to conduct self-checks and prepare for audits.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was Regulatory changes announced; affected entities advised to conduct self-checks and prepare for audits..
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Regulatory Overhaul TUV1765188618
Root Causes: Inadequate security measures and oversight in the existing certification regime led to high-profile breaches at certified firms.
Corrective Actions: Mandatory ISMS-P certification for high-risk operators, revamped audit methods, expanded inspections, and stricter enforcement of compliance.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Mandatory ISMS-P certification for high-risk operators, revamped audit methods, expanded inspections, and stricter enforcement of compliance..
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-12-08.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was High-profile breaches at certified firms highlighted gaps in the existing certification regime, necessitating stricter oversight and mandatory compliance for high-risk operators.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Companies should prepare for stricter audits, self-assess security vulnerabilities and and ensure compliance with the new ISMS-P certification requirements to avoid denial or cancellation of certification..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is MLex.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (on-site inspections planned for Q1 2026).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Regulatory changes announced; affected entities advised to conduct self-checks and prepare for audits., .
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description
Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description
Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=tuv-rheinland-group' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
