Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Orange RDC » ORA1768963858

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ORA1768963858)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-158
Company Score Before Incident762 / 1000
Company Score After Incident604 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERORA1768963858
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDOver 1 million customer records
INCIDENT DATE15/06/2023
STATUSUnder investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Orange RDC's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Orange RDC Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Orange RDC breach identified under incident ID ORA1768963858.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Orange RDC's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/orange-rdc, the number of followers: 123697, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 1193 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 762 and after the incident was 604 with a difference of -158 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Orange RDC and their customers.

Orange Rwanda recently reported "Orange Rwanda Customer Data Allegedly Leaked in Cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A ransomware group known as HawkSec has claimed responsibility for a data breach affecting Orange Rwanda, one of Africa’s largest telecommunications providers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Over 1 million customer records, with nearly Over 1 million records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Under investigation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group...claimed responsibility for a data breach affecting Orange Rwanda and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating targeting major corporations and their supply chains. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process: Password Filter DLL (T1556.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breach could enable SIM swapping...to bypass multi-factor authentication and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating over 1 million customer records...including national ID numbers. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stole over 1 million customer records, including full names, national ID numbers and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating telecommunications provider...customer records compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes, over 1 million records stolen and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating posted the stolen information on a popular cybercrime forum. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating type such as Ransomware, but no confirmation of data encryption and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating risks of identity theft, fraud, and social engineering attacks. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating sIM swapping to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA) and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware’s origin or extent of breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (40%)
Credential Access
Modify Authentication Process: Password Filter DLL (60%)
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (60%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (50%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (40%)

Sources & References