Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Oracle » TULORA1777415654

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TULORA1777415654)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact0
Company Score Before Incident100 / 1000
Company Score After Incident100 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTULORA1777415654
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORExploitation of vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS)
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers, direct...
INCIDENT DATE08/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Oracle's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Oracle Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Oracle breach identified under incident ID TULORA1777415654.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Oracle's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oracle, the number of followers: 11005980, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 197447 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Oracle and their customers.

On 02 April 2025, Tulane University disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Tulane University Data Breach Exposes Employee and Student Worker Information".

Tulane University has confirmed a data breach affecting multiple employees and student workers, exposing sensitive personal and financial information.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS), and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, direct deposit banking details.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and began remediation that includes Addressed the vulnerability, and stakeholders are being briefed through Letters sent to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Corrective measures have been implemented to prevent future occurrences, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Letters sent to affected individuals on April 2, 2025.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exploiting a vulnerability in Oracle EBS, and unauthorized access occurred on August 10, 2025. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Network Device Configuration (T1552.008) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating direct deposit banking details stored in Oracle EBS were compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating names, Social Security numbers, and direct deposit banking details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating cl0p publicly claimed responsibility and threatened to release stolen files and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration attributed to Cl0p ransomware group. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (Extortion) (T1471) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cl0p ransomware group, a Russian-speaking extortion operation and Defacement: External Defacement (T1491.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cl0p threatened to release the stolen files on dark web. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to Oracle EBS, likely using compromised credentials and Exploitation for Defense Evasion (T1211) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a vulnerability in Oracle EBS to gain unauthorized access. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Network Device Configuration (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (Extortion) (60%)
Defacement: External Defacement (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploitation for Defense Evasion (80%)