Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Oracle » ORAWIT1773930753

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ORAWIT1773930753)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-7
Company Score Before Incident295 / 1000
Company Score After Incident288 / 1000
Company LinkView Oracle Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERORAWIT1773930753
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE16/10/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Oracle's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Oracle Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Oracle breach identified under incident ID ORAWIT1773930753.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Oracle's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oracle, the number of followers: 11005980, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 197447 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 295 and after the incident was 288 with a difference of -7 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Oracle and their customers.

Wits University recently reported "Wits University Zero-Day Cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Wits University in South Africa has confirmed a cyberattack targeting its IT systems, classified as a zero-day exploit leveraging an unknown vulnerability with no available patch at the time of the incident.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Some IT systems compromised.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating zero-day exploit leveraging an unknown vulnerability with no available patch. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating zero-day exploit targeting its IT systems. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating some IT systems were compromised. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack targeting its IT systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating oracle and cybersecurity experts to assess whether any data was compromised. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Defense Evasion (T1211) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating zero-day exploit...no available patch at the time of the incident. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (80%)
Persistence
External Remote Services (60%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Defense Evasion
Exploitation for Defense Evasion (90%)

Sources & References