Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ORA1770195349)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Oracle's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Oracle Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Oracle breach identified under incident ID ORA1770195349.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Oracle's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oracle, the number of followers: 11005980, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 197447 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 100 and after the incident was 100 with a difference of 0 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Oracle and their customers.
On 31 October 2023, University of Pennsylvania disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "University of Pennsylvania Data Breach".
A high-profile data breach at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn), initially alleged by anonymous hackers to have exposed records of 1.2 million students, donors, and alumni, was confirmed to have affected fewer than 10 individuals.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Development and alumni activities systems, and exposing Personal data of fewer than 10 individuals, with nearly Fewer than 10 records at risk.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and began remediation that includes Comprehensive review of compromised files, notifications to affected individuals, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement dismissing hackers' claims, notifications to affected individuals.
The case underscores how Ongoing (comprehensive review completed), teams are taking away lessons such as Limited scope of breach despite initial claims, need for improved cybersecurity measures, and recommending next steps like Implement mandatory cybersecurity training, strengthen defenses against future attacks, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notifications sent to affected individuals.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hackers sent a provocative email purporting to be from Penn to students and alumni and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breach targeted systems linked to development and alumni activities. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials in Files (T1552.006) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating personal data of fewer than 10 individuals compromised in alumni systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal data...compromised via development and alumni activities systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating limited number of individuals had their personal data exposed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating hackers falsely claimed the university had terrible security practices and Service Stop (T1489) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating provocative emails urging donors to stop giving money. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating penn could not initially verify the scale of the breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Oracle Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/oracle/incident/ORA1770195349
- Oracle CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/oracle
- Oracle Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/ora1770195349-oracle-breach-february-2026/
- Oracle CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/oracle/history
- Oracle CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.inquirer.com/education/university-of-pennsylvania-data-breach-filing-20260203.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf