Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Oracle Security » SAMFOXORAFORDHL1781785487

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SAMFOXORAFORDHL1781785487)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-83
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident672 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSAMFOXORAFORDHL1781785487
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORBrute-force attack, Exploited vulnerabilities
DATA EXPOSED73,932 unique firewall URLs with...
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Oracle Security's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Oracle Security Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Oracle Security breach identified under incident ID SAMFOXORAFORDHL1781785487.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Oracle Security's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oracle-security, the number of followers: 11377, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 672 with a difference of -83 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Oracle Security and their customers.

Samsung recently reported "Russian Cybercriminal Group Exposes 74,000 Fortinet Firewall Credentials in Massive Leak", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A Russian-speaking cybercriminal group inadvertently exposed credentials from nearly 74,000 Fortinet firewalls and VPN gateways worldwide after leaving the data unsecured on a server.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Fortinet firewalls and VPN gateways, and exposing 73,932 unique firewall URLs with credentials, with nearly 73,932 unique firewall URLs records at risk.

In response, and began remediation that includes Credential rotation, MFA enforcement and System upgrades.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Assume compromise if domain/IP appears in exposed dataset, Rotate credentials and Enforce MFA.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including exposed FortiGate Management Interface to the internet, and exploited vulnerabilities in Fortinet firewalls and External Remote Services (T1133) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including intercepting SSL VPN authentication hashes, and 73,932 unique firewall URLs exposed. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including cracking hashes using a 45-GPU cluster via Hashtopolis, and weak password storage (SHA-256 with salt), Credentials in Configuration Files (T1552.007) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including configuration files containing sensitive information harvested, and 74,000 Fortinet firewall credentials exposed, and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including automated large-scale harvesting of credentials, and fortinet VPN gateways compromised. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating infiltrate Active Directory environments using cracked credentials and Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating leveraging passwords to infiltrate Active Directory environments. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating configuration files containing sensitive information harvested and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating classified defense documents exfiltrated from Turkish NATO contractor. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating turkish NATO defense contractor suffered exfiltration of classified documents and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data leak via unsecured server by cybercriminal group. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Spraying (T1110.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating automated large-scale harvesting of credentials via brute-force and Subvert Trust Controls: Install Root Certificate (T1553.004) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating intercepting SSL VPN authentication hashes. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential unauthorized access to Active Directory environments and Account Access Removal (T1531) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating credential rotation recommended for impacted organizations. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
External Remote Services (90%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (95%)
Credentials in Configuration Files (90%)
Credentials from Password Stores (80%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (70%)
Valid Accounts (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Defense Evasion
Brute Force: Password Spraying (70%)
Subvert Trust Controls: Install Root Certificate (50%)
Impact
Defacement: Internal Defacement (40%)
Account Access Removal (60%)

Sources & References