Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Oracle RMS Insurance Risk Management Services Inc. » KROORAFIT1782750719

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (KROORAFIT1782750719)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident752 / 1000
Company Score After Incident750 / 1000
Company LinkView Oracle RMS Insurance Risk Management Services Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERKROORAFIT1782750719
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORZero-day vulnerability exploitation
DATA EXPOSEDFinancial and ratings data tied...
INCIDENT DATE26/05/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Oracle RMS Insurance Risk Management Services Inc.'s Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Oracle RMS Insurance Risk Management Services Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Oracle RMS Insurance Risk Management Services Inc. breach identified under incident ID KROORAFIT1782750719.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Oracle RMS Insurance Risk Management Services Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oracle-rms-insurance-risk-management-services-inc, the number of followers: 2324, the industry type: Insurance and the number of employees: 180 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 750 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Oracle RMS Insurance Risk Management Services Inc. and their customers.

On 09 June 2024, National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "NAIC Data Breach Linked to Oracle PeopleSoft Zero-Day Exploit".

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) confirmed that threat actors exploited a critical zero-day vulnerability in Oracle PeopleSoft’s Environment Management component, exposing financial and ratings data tied to insurer investments.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Oracle PeopleSoft Environment Management component, and exposing Financial and ratings data tied to insurer investments.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Risks of unpatched enterprise software, particularly in sectors handling critical regulatory data, and recommending next steps like Patch management for critical software, enhanced monitoring for supply chain threats, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Over 100 organizations notified by Mandiant.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a critical zero-day vulnerability in Oracle PeopleSoft’s Environment Management component. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating remote code execution flaw in certain versions of PeopleSoft PeopleTools. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Network Device Configuration (T1552.008) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exposed financial and ratings data tied to insurer investments (implied access to regulatory systems). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposing financial and ratings data tied to insurer investments and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating impacted sensitive regulatory data used by U.S. insurance regulators. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data later posted on a leak site. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: External Defacement (T1491.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting regulatory data posted on a leak site. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (95%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Network Device Configuration (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (85%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Defacement: External Defacement (70%)

Sources & References