Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » OpenClaw » OPE1772403877

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (OPE1772403877)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-5
Company Score Before Incident659 / 1000
Company Score After Incident654 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBEROPE1772403877
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORMalicious Website (WebSocket Brute-Force)
DATA EXPOSEDCredentials, files, messaging histories, sensitive...
INCIDENT DATE25/02/2026
STATUSResolved

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of OpenClaw's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts OpenClaw Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the OpenClaw breach identified under incident ID OPE1772403877.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of OpenClaw's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/openclawai, the number of followers: 2607, the industry type: Technology, Information and Internet and the number of employees: 5 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 659 and after the incident was 654 with a difference of -5 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on OpenClaw and their customers.

On 26 February 2026, OpenClaw AI Platform disclosed Vulnerability Exploitation issues under the banner "ClawJacked Vulnerability in OpenClaw AI Platform".

Security researchers at Oasis Security uncovered a critical flaw, dubbed 'ClawJacked,' in the widely used OpenClaw AI agent, enabling attackers to silently brute-force access to locally running instances via a malicious website.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting OpenClaw AI platform (locally running instances), and exposing Credentials, files, messaging histories, sensitive data.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Patch released (version 2026.2.26), and began remediation that includes Tightened WebSocket security, added protections against localhost brute-forcing, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure, advisory to update immediately.

The case underscores how Resolved, teams are taking away lessons such as Default localhost bindings can expose critical services to silent brute-force attacks. Rate-limiting exemptions for loopback addresses pose significant risks, and recommending next steps like Update OpenClaw to version 2026.2.26 immediately, Audit locally running services for exposed WebSocket interfaces and Implement strict rate-limiting for all interfaces, including localhost, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Organizations using OpenClaw advised to update immediately to mitigate exploitation risks.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating malicious website could use JavaScript to establish a connection and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating brute-force the management password...Once authenticated. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating execute shell commands on connected nodes. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating brute-force the management password at hundreds of attempts per second and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating dump credentials...admin-level access to the AI platform. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrate files, search messaging histories for sensitive data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrate files...via a single browser tab. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating register as a trusted device without user confirmation and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating loopback address was exempt from throttling...no logging of failed attempts. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: SSH (T1021.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating execute shell commands on connected nodes. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Drive-by Compromise (90%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Execution
Command and Scripting Interpreter (80%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (95%)
OS Credential Dumping (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Defense Evasion
Trusted Relationship (80%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: SSH (70%)