Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Openbaar MinisterieOpenbaar Ministerie
VS
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Openbaar Ministerie

Openbaar Ministerie

Prins Clauslaan 16, Den Haag, Zuid Holland, NL, 2595 AJ

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.om.nl
696/1000Weak

Mensen die worden verdacht van het plegen van een strafbaar feit, krijgen met het Openbaar Ministerie (OM) te maken. Het OM is de enige instantie in Nederland die verdachten voor de strafrechter kan brengen. Het OM zorgt ervoor dat strafbare feiten worden opgespoord en ...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:2,819
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

J. Edgar Hoover Building, Washington, 20535-0001, US

Last Update: 16/10/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.fbijobs.gov
100/1000Critical

This is the official Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) LinkedIn account and is used to build awareness of workplace culture, engagement opportunities, and the FBI mission. The FBI does not collect comments or messages through this account. The FBI is the premier ...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:10,425
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
30
Known data breaches
25
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Openbaar Ministerie

Openbaar Ministerie

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Openbaar Ministerie in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has 2841.18% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Openbaar Ministerie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Openbaar Ministerie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Openbaar Ministerie

Openbaar Ministerie

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OPE523082025
🔒 Incident : Breach
OPE217081225
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FBI1792154003
🔒 Incident : Breach
VIBATTAMAPAYFBIINTWALCAS1791910145
🔒 Incident : Breach
FBI1791261379

FAQ

Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie company and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Openbaar Ministerie or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Openbaar Ministerie or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Openbaar Ministerie and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3