Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OpenAIOpenAI
VS
University of AmsterdamUniversity of Amsterdam
OpenAI

OpenAI

San Francisco, 94110, US

Last Update: 13/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://openai.com/
379/1000Critical

OpenAI is an AI research and deployment company dedicated to ensuring that general-purpose artificial intelligence benefits all of humanity. AI is an extremely powerful tool that must be created with safety and human needs at its core. OpenAI is dedicated to putting tha...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:9,859
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
29
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
4
University of Amsterdam

University of Amsterdam

Spui 21, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1012 WX, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uva.nl
781/1000Fair

The University of Amsterdam is one of the largest comprehensive universities in Europe. With some 44,000 students, 6,000 staff, 3,000 PhD candidates, and an annual budget of more than 850 million euros, it is also one of Amsterdam’s biggest employers. There is an inse...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:11,154
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OpenAI

OpenAI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Amsterdam

University of Amsterdam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

OpenAI has 2064.18% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Amsterdam in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OpenAI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OpenAI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Amsterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Amsterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OpenAI

OpenAI

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
OPE1783419841
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OPEAPP1783974559
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
OPE1783009491
University of Amsterdam

University of Amsterdam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OpenAI company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OpenAI and University of Amsterdam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OpenAI and University of Amsterdam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OpenAI or University of Amsterdam ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OpenAI or University of Amsterdam ?
Between OpenAI and University of Amsterdam, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OpenAI and University of Amsterdam, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2