Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Open Arms Care » OPE1781223902

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (OPE1781223902)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-63
Company Score Before Incident765 / 1000
Company Score After Incident702 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBEROPE1781223902
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized email account access
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal data, including names,...
INCIDENT DATE31/05/2015
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Open Arms Care's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Open Arms Care Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Open Arms Care breach identified under incident ID OPE1781223902.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Open Arms Care's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/open-arms-care, the number of followers: 1076, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 519 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 702 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Open Arms Care and their customers.

On 06 June 2026, Open Arms Care Corp. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Open Arms Care 2015 Data Breach".

Open Arms Care Corp.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Email accounts, and exposing Sensitive personal data, including names, Social Security numbers, medical diagnoses, treatment details, health insurance information, and financial account information.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, and began remediation that includes Implementation of measures to prevent future breaches, and stakeholders are being briefed through Data privacy notice posted on website, notification letters mailed to affected individuals, toll-free call center established.

The case underscores how Completed, and recommending next steps like Affected individuals advised to place fraud alerts, request credit reports, and report suspicious activity, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Steps to protect personal information, including placing fraud alerts, requesting credit reports, and reporting suspicious activity. Toll-free call center established for inquiries.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its email accounts between June and August 2015 and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its email accounts. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Cracking (T1110.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its email accounts and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating email accounts were compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data...may have been accessed or acquired from email accounts and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating names, Social Security numbers, medical diagnoses, treatment details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach involving unauthorized access to email accounts and Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data may have been accessed or acquired. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive personal data may have been accessed or acquired and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on extent of breach or data manipulation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (80%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Credential Access
Brute Force: Password Cracking (60%)
Credentials from Password Stores (50%)
Collection
Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (90%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (60%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Data Destruction (30%)

Sources & References