Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Onyx Equities » ONY1775162754

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ONY1775162754)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-97
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident657 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERONY1775162754
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSocial security numbers, names
INCIDENT DATE20/01/2026
STATUSOngoing (investigated by Shamis & Gentile P.A.)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Onyx Equities's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Onyx Equities Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Onyx Equities breach identified under incident ID ONY1775162754.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Onyx Equities's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/onyx-equities, the number of followers: 4075, the industry type: Real Estate and the number of employees: 94 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 657 with a difference of -97 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Onyx Equities and their customers.

On 02 April 2026, Onyx Equities LLC disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Onyx Equities Hit by CL0P Ransomware Attack, Exposing Sensitive Data".

Onyx Equities LLC, a New Jersey-based real estate investment and property services firm, has fallen victim to a ransomware attack by the CL0P cybercriminal group.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Social security numbers, names.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing (investigated by Shamis & Gentile P.A.).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cL0P ransomware attack, details on how or when the breach occurred remain unclear and Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating supply chain such as false (explicitly ruled out). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating social security numbers and names exposed (implies credential harvesting) and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cL0P group known for credential dumping in ransomware attacks. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating social security numbers and names compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating real estate firm managing sensitive personal information. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers claimed to have exfiltrated company data (dark web disclosure) and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cL0P group known for exfiltrating data to cloud storage. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating type such as Ransomware (CL0P strain) and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cL0P group known for defacement in ransomware attacks. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cL0P ransomware known for obfuscation techniques and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks often disable security tools. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (30%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (50%)
OS Credential Dumping (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (70%)
Defacement: Internal Defacement (40%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References