Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Onslow County Schools » ONS1784082218

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ONS1784082218)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-17
Company Score Before Incident845 / 1000
Company Score After Incident828 / 1000
Company LinkView Onslow County Schools Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERONS1784082218
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE12/06/2026
STATUSActive

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Onslow County Schools's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Onslow County Schools Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Onslow County Schools breach identified under incident ID ONS1784082218.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Onslow County Schools's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/onslow-county-schools, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Education Administration Programs and the number of employees: 1692 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 845 and after the incident was 828 with a difference of -17 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Onslow County Schools and their customers.

Onslow County Schools recently reported "Onslow County Schools Cybersecurity Incident", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Onslow County Schools (OCS) in North Carolina has fallen victim to a cybersecurity crime, prompting an active investigation led by the district’s IT staff in collaboration with local, state, and federal law enforcement authorities.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Active.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity crime...remains under scrutiny; no details on attack origin and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating concerns about the protection of student and staff privacy. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating student and staff privacy concerns; identity theft risk and Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating educational institutions as high-value targets for cyberattacks. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating student and staff privacy concerns; data breach investigation. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating active investigation with law enforcement; data breach concerns. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity crime with significant impact on data protection and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no details on systems affected or attack nature. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Unsecured Credentials (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Defacement (20%)

Sources & References