What is the official website of OneTouchPoint ?

The official website of OneTouchPoint is https://1touchpoint.com/.

What is OneTouchPoint's cybersecurity risk score?

OneTouchPoint has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 510 out of 1000, indicating a Critical security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has OneTouchPoint experienced?

According to Rankiteo, OneTouchPoint currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has OneTouchPoint been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, OneTouchPoint has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does OneTouchPoint have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, OneTouchPoint is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does OneTouchPoint have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, OneTouchPoint does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does OneTouchPoint comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, OneTouchPoint is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does OneTouchPoint have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, OneTouchPoint does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does OneTouchPoint comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, OneTouchPoint is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does OneTouchPoint have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,OneTouchPoint is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does OneTouchPoint operate in ?

OneTouchPoint operates primarily in the Marketing Services industry.

How many employees does OneTouchPoint have ?

OneTouchPoint employs approximately 300 people worldwide.

Does OneTouchPoint own any subsidiaries ?

OneTouchPoint presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does OneTouchPoint have ?

OneTouchPoint's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,255 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for OneTouchPoint ?

OneTouchPoint is classified under the NAICS code 5418, which corresponds to Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services.

Does OneTouchPoint have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, OneTouchPoint does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does OneTouchPoint have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, OneTouchPoint maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/onetouchpoint.

How many cybersecurity incidents has OneTouchPoint experienced ?

As of September 9, 2026, Rankiteo reports that OneTouchPoint has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does OneTouchPoint have ?

OneTouchPoint has an estimated 3,428 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has OneTouchPoint faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Breach.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

OneTouchPoint

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

510

/1000

Critical

535

/1000

Critical

OneTouchPoint Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

1touchpoint.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

OneTouchPoint delivers purpose-built technology solutions and managed services designed specifically to support the industries we serve. Today, we power more than 3,000 brands, including Fortune 500 companies in the manufacturing, healthcare, healthcare insurance, financial services, alcohol & beverage, franchise, and retail industries across our technology and production platforms. OneTouchPoint seamlessly brings together local marketing capabilities, brand management, state-of-the-art commercial printing capabilities, and complete production and fulfillment capabilities to create elevated brand experiences across customer touchpoints – online, offline or in-store. At OneTouchPoint, we're here to help organizations amplify their brand,

OneTouchPoint

OneTouchPoint CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

OneTouchPoint

Ransomware

100

9/2026

ONE1788827018

OneTouchPoint

Breach

4/2022

ONE218072725

Loading…

A.I.

OneTouchPoint Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for OneTouchPoint

Incidents vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

OneTouchPoint has 33.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

OneTouchPoint has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types OneTouchPoint vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

OneTouchPoint reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 1 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History - OneTouchPoint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

OneTouchPoint Subsidiaries

Parent Company

OneTouchPoint

Marketing Services

Website: https://1touchpoint.com/

Company Size: 501-1,000 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

OneTouchPoint Similar Companies

RR Donnelley

cb rrd.com

RRD provides a complete portfolio of marketing, packaging, print and business services to the world’s most respected brands, including 91% of the Fortune 100. Our proprietary technology, advanced data analytics and established expertise fuel organizational decision-making, from strategy through execution. With operations in 30 countries, global organizations and regulated industries trust RRD to reduce complexity and drive audience connections across the entire customer journey.

Loading…

NEWS

OneTouchPoint CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

October 11, 2024 07:00 AM

2024 Cyber Litigation Legal Update – What Your Business Needs To Know

This Legal Update discusses recent cyber-litigation trends, notable data breach class-action litigation, and considerations for protecting privilege during a...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-86564

SUMMARY

A flaw was found in DPDK lib/vhost. Missing length validation before reading command_data in the virtio-net control-queue handler can cause an out-of-bounds read and a host process crash.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55250

SUMMARY

Maravel, a PHP framework oriented towards dependency injection, prior to version 10.74.0 has a high-severity Token Replay Vulnerability arising from a structural lifecycle mismatch between stateless token validation engines and high-performance relational caching layers. Any application with low cache memory that causes premature eviction to free up memory and applications running macropay-solutions/maravel-framework that utilize tymon/jwt-auth for API token authentication and blacklist management or any other package that does the same may be affected. This architectural risk might also impact native Laravel applications utilizing cache tags under specific volatile or eviction-capped environments. tymon/jwt-auth automatically probes for cache tag support. If found, it forcefully wraps 14-day token blacklist entries (jti) inside a relational tymon.jwt tag. In environments where the O(1) Atomic Lazy Eviction model is active — either natively inside Maravel-Framework v20.x or manually backported into v10.x via the explicit DI container singletons provided in PR #104 (App\Cache\TaggedCache and App\Cache\TagSet) — a strict global tracking ceiling (Container::TAGGED_CACHE_TTL_CAP_SECONDS) of 7,200 seconds (2 hours) is enforced to secure the system against memory index bloat. This ceiling forcefully truncates the 14-day blacklist lifespan down to a maximum of 2 hours, after which individual tracking keys naturally expire and disappear from the active cache window. Furthermore, because the optimized engine implements a generational version matrix to achieve O(1) flush speeds, any programmatic or manual invocation of a tag flush or reset (e.g., Cache::tags([...])->flush()) instantly bumps the internal atomic master version pointer. This shifts the computed cryptographic composite hash (sha1($this->tags->getNamespace())) for all overlapping components, rendering the entire existing index immediately unreachable. Consequently, through either natural 2-hour expiration or an intervening tag flush execution (like the cache naturally cleaning old values to free up memory), the invalidation state records are entirely wiped out. Because the tokens' physical cryptographic signatures remain structurally valid for up to 14 days, stolen, hijacked, or legitimately logged-out tokens are instantly and silently resurrected across the entire API gateway, leaving the application critically vulnerable to widespread Token Replay Attacks. Because this issue is caused by an upstream architectural assumption within the tymon/jwt-auth package rather than a core defect inside the framework, there is no direct framework version upgrade that can safely bypass this lifecycle collision without breaking business cache recycling bounds. Maravel version 10.74.0 introduced a way to backport the new fixed tagged cache from 20.x into 10.x by resolving TagSet and TaggedCache from DI, which is how this latent architectural lifecycle vulnerability was discovered. Users must apply the decoupled configuration workaround outlined below. As a workaround, make sure that cache memory size does not generate early natural evictions from cache to free up space, deleting blacklisted jwt ids before they expire. Applications must decouple flat authentication vectors from the relational tagging subsystem. This forces token identifiers to write directly to the primary cache keyspace as flat, un-tagged key-value pairs where they securely retain their unclipped 14-day lifecycle.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-53639

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, the `GET /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` and `PUT /api/v2/shop/payment-requests/{hash}` endpoints look up the payment request solely by the hash from the URL. No ownership check is performed against the authenticated customer or the underlying order. An attacker who obtains a payment request hash can read the payment request and, through the `payment` IRI in the response, recover the underlying order's `tokenValue` (which itself grants access to the full order, items, addresses, customer email, totals); and/or update the payment request payload (e.g. `target_path`, `after_path`). These fields are used by the front-end controller to redirect the user after the payment, so an attacker can flip them to an attacker-controlled URL and intercept the buyer. The hash is a UUID, so it has to be obtained out-of-band (logs, shared links, referrer headers, a co-located client), but once it is known no other credential is required, neither authentication nor knowledge of the order token. The creation endpoint `POST /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payment-requests` shares the same flaw: it resolves the target order solely from the `tokenValue` in the URL without verifying that the caller owns the order. The issue is fixed in versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6. As a workaround, add a query extension that filters the `GET` operation; decorate the `PUT` state provider, guard the `POST` creation endpoint with a command-bus middleware, and wire the services.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-mr9r-h354-966r

CVE-2026-53638

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6, an authorization bypass vulnerability exists in the shop account API. The `PATCH /api/v2/shop/account/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}` endpoint, used by an authenticated shop customer to change the payment method of an order that has been placed but not yet paid (state `STATE_NEW`), does not validate that the chosen payment method is enabled for the order's channel. The equivalent checkout endpoint (`PATCH /api/v2/shop/orders/{tokenValue}/payments/{paymentId}`) correctly rejects out-of-channel payment methods with `HTTP 422`; the account endpoint silently accepts them and returns `HTTP 200`. An authenticated customer can therefore assign any globally enabled payment method to their own placed order, including methods that the store operator has explicitly excluded from that channel. The issue is fixed in versions: 2.0.18, 2.1.15, 2.2.6 and above. As a workaround, decorate the `Sylius\Bundle\ApiBundle\Changer\PaymentMethodChangerInterface` service in the application.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-6955-hrm5-c4qp

CVE-2026-53637

SUMMARY

Sylius is an Open Source eCommerce Framework on Symfony. Versions 2.0.0 through 2.0.17, 2.1.0 through 2.1.14, and 2.2.0 through 2.2.5 contain an improper workflow enforcement vulnerability in the cart `FormComponent`. When an order is completed while its cart page remains open, the stale LiveComponent does not detect the order’s changed state and continues to permit cart actions, allowing an authenticated customer to modify or permanently delete an already completed order. Versions 2.0.18, 2.1.15, and 2.2.6 contain a patch. As a workaround, deployments can copy the patched `FormComponent` into the application's `src/` directory and override the `sylius_shop.twig.component.cart.form` service definition to use that class.

Published

Date2026-09-08

Updated

Date2026-09-08

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

https://github.com/Sylius/Sylius/security/advisories/GHSA-5597-7rmh-97q5

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

OneTouchPoint Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

OneTouchPoint A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

OneTouchPoint CyberSecurity News & History

OneTouchPoint Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for OneTouchPoint

Incidents vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types OneTouchPoint vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - OneTouchPoint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OneTouchPoint Subsidiaries

Parent Company

OneTouchPoint

OneTouchPoint Similar Companies

RR Donnelley

OneTouchPoint CyberSecurity News

2024 Cyber Litigation Legal Update – What Your Business Needs To Know

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

OneTouchPoint CyberSecurity News & History

OneTouchPoint Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for OneTouchPoint

Incidents vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types OneTouchPoint vs Marketing Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - OneTouchPoint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OneTouchPoint Subsidiaries

Parent Company

OneTouchPoint

OneTouchPoint Similar Companies

RR Donnelley

OneTouchPoint CyberSecurity News

2024 Cyber Litigation Legal Update – What Your Business Needs To Know

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo