Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ONE1770760763)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of OneEighty, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts OneEighty, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the OneEighty, Inc. breach identified under incident ID ONE1770760763.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of OneEighty, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oneeighty-inc., the number of followers: 449, the industry type: Mental Health Care and the number of employees: 65 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 680 and after the incident was 587 with a difference of -93 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on OneEighty, Inc. and their customers.
On 10 February 2026, The Counseling Center of Wayne and Holmes Counties disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Cybersecurity Breach at Ohio Behavioral Health Provider Exposes Data of 83,000 Individuals".
On February 10, 2026, The Counseling Center of Wayne and Holmes Counties, an Ohio-based healthcare provider specializing in behavioral and emotional health services, disclosed a cybersecurity incident that compromised the personal and medical data of over 83,000 individuals.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Network, and exposing Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and Protected Health Information (PHI), with nearly 83000 records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Under Investigation.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the organization’s network and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on breach’s origin or vulnerability exploited. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the organization’s network and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating pII and PHI compromised; no specific credential dumping details. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, medical records, and treatment details exposed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating health insurance details and medical record numbers compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting over 83,000 individuals and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on exfiltration method; cloud transfer possible. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction; included due to breach severity and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating potential identity theft and fraud risks for affected individuals. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- OneEighty, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/oneeighty-inc./incident/ONE1770760763
- OneEighty, Inc. CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/oneeighty-inc.
- OneEighty, Inc. Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/one1770760763-the-counseling-center-of-wayne-and-holmes-counties-breach-february-2026/
- OneEighty, Inc. CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/oneeighty-inc./history
- OneEighty, Inc. CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/02/10/3235802/0/en/The-Counseling-Center-Data-Breach-Claims-Investigated-by-Lynch-Carpenter.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf