Comparison Overview
OHRA

OHRA
Rijksweg West 2, Arnhem, 6842 BD, NL
Last Update: 29/12/2025
Wij zijn al meer dan 90 jaar een verzekeraar op de Nederlandse markt. Toen we in 1925 begonnen heetten we voluit Onderlinge ziektekostenverzekeringsfonds van Hoogere RijksAmbtenaren. Dit hebben we afgekort naar OHRA. Nu zeggen we alleen nog OHRA. Met ruim 300 collega’s...

Allianz Partners
Eurosquare 2, Saint-Ouen, 93400, FR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Allianz Partners is a world leader in B2B2C insurance and assistance, offering global solutions that span international health and life, travel insurance, automotive and assistance. Customer driven, our innovative experts are redefining insurance services by delivering ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

OHRA







Allianz Partners






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for OHRA in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Allianz Partners in 2026.
Incident History - OHRA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
OHRA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Allianz Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Allianz Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

OHRA

Allianz Partners
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.