Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Office of the Prime Minister Uganda » OFF1775024914

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (OFF1775024914)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-27
Company Score Before Incident761 / 1000
Company Score After Incident734 / 1000
Company LinkView Office of the Prime Minister Uganda Profile
INCIDENT NUMBEROFF1775024914
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE30/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Office of the Prime Minister Uganda's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Office of the Prime Minister Uganda Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Office of the Prime Minister Uganda breach identified under incident ID OFF1775024914.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Office of the Prime Minister Uganda's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/office-of-the-prime-minister-uganda, the number of followers: 531, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 84 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 734 with a difference of -27 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Office of the Prime Minister Uganda and their customers.

On 31 March 2024, Government of Uganda disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Cyberattacks on Uganda Linked to Iran Following Military Chief’s Pro-Israel Stance".

Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces, Muhoozi Kainerugaba, has accused Iran of launching cyberattacks against the country after he publicly declared support for Israel in the ongoing Middle East conflict.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public statement by Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattacks against the country following public declaration of support and Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on attack vector, but geopolitical retaliation suspected. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating government systems likely targeted; no specifics on compromise method. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating public statement by Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces implies disruption and Financial Theft (T1657) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no financial impact reported, but retaliation motive suggests potential. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no data breach details, but state-sponsored actors often exfiltrate. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (T1078.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating government systems targeted; likely abuse of legitimate access and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no forensic details, but state actors often conceal activity. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Drive-by Compromise (40%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Impact
Defacement (50%)
Financial Theft (30%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (40%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Default Accounts (50%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (40%)

Sources & References