Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Off Coast Wellness » OFF1782752302

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (OFF1782752302)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-64
Company Score Before Incident763 / 1000
Company Score After Incident699 / 1000
Company LinkView Off Coast Wellness Profile
INCIDENT NUMBEROFF1782752302
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII) and...
INCIDENT DATE27/04/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Off Coast Wellness's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Off Coast Wellness Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Off Coast Wellness breach identified under incident ID OFF1782752302.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Off Coast Wellness's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/off-coast-wellness, the number of followers: 18, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 2 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 763 and after the incident was 699 with a difference of -64 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Off Coast Wellness and their customers.

On 26 June 2026, Women’s Wellness of Southern Delaware disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Women’s Wellness of Southern Delaware Data Breach".

Women’s Wellness of Southern Delaware disclosed a data breach involving patient information retained by a former provider after their departure.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Established a dedicated assistance line for affected individuals, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public notice issued via PR Newswire.

The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Dedicated assistance line (1-833-786-9172) established for inquiries.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (T1078.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating former provider had retained contact and medical details after departure. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating retained data included PII and PHI for aesthetic/clinical service patients. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating former provider kept names, emails, birthdates, medical history, photos and Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating patient data retained by former provider after departure from facility. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (T1048.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating former provider used retained info to contact patients about new practice. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but unauthorized retention occurred and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating former provider used data for business purposes at new practice. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (90%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Unencrypted/Obfuscated Non-C2 Protocol (80%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (60%)

Sources & References