Comparison Overview
Odido Nederland

Odido Nederland
Waldorpstraat 60, The Hague, South Holland, NL, 2521 CC
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Samen zijn we Odido Hallo, Odido hier. Je provider voor Mobiel, Glasvezel en TV. En met bijna 2.000 collega’s laten we zien dat telecom anders kan. Menselijker. Want technologie is er voor iedereen. Waar je ook vandaan komt, waar je ook heengaat. Onze naam kan je van ...

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
Avenida Eng. Luís Carlos Berrini, 1376, São Paulo, 04571 - 000, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) is part of the Telefónica Group and with more than 94 million customers, of which 75 million mobile and 19 million fixed, we are the largest telecommunications company in Brazil, with nationwide presence and a complete, convergent portfolio of p...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Odido Nederland







Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Odido Nederland has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) in 2026.
Incident History - Odido Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Odido Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Vivo (Telefônica Brasil) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Odido Nederland

Vivo (Telefônica Brasil)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.