Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » ODIDO » FORCHEMIKPALMICODIADOITR1789359970

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FORCHEMIKPALMICODIADOITR1789359970)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-33
Company Score Before Incident604 / 1000
Company Score After Incident571 / 1000
Company LinkView ODIDO Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERFORCHEMIKPALMICODIADOITR1789359970
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORPhishing, Vishing, Exploit kits, Zero-click exploits, AI-generated malware, Supply chain attacks, Man-in-the-middle (MITM)
DATA EXPOSEDPassports, driver’s licenses, transaction histories,...
INCIDENT DATE07/09/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of ODIDO's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts ODIDO Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the ODIDO breach identified under incident ID FORCHEMIKPALMICODIADOITR1789359970.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of ODIDO's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/odido, the number of followers: 235, the industry type: Information Technology & Services and the number of employees: 28 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 604 and after the incident was 571 with a difference of -33 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on ODIDO and their customers.

Microsoft recently reported "Cybersecurity Roundup: Zero-Days, AI-Driven Attacks, and Major Breaches Dominate the Week", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

This week’s cybersecurity landscape was marked by a surge in critical vulnerabilities, active exploitation campaigns, and high-profile breaches highlighting persistent threats to enterprises, governments, and consumers.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows, Office, SQL Server, Exchange, SharePoint, Azure, developer tools (Microsoft), FortiOS, FortiSwitchManager, FortiProxy (Fortinet) and PAN-OS (Palo Alto Networks), and exposing Passports, driver’s licenses, transaction histories, Bitcoin activity (Revolut), 6.39 million records (Odido) and 300,000 national ID records (North African government), with nearly ['6.39 million (Odido)', '300,000 (North African government)', '1.8 million Android apps (ShinyHunters)'] records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Patches released (Microsoft, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, PostgreSQL) and Upgrades recommended (FortiOS 7.6.7+, PAN-OS 12.2.3+, PostgreSQL 18.6+), and began remediation that includes Hardening patches for Magento/Adobe Commerce and Network segmentation for exposed devices.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Organizations must prioritize patch management, credential security, and AI threat monitoring to mitigate risks in an increasingly complex threat landscape, and recommending next steps like Apply patches immediately (Microsoft, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, PostgreSQL), Upgrade to secure versions (FortiOS 7.6.7+, PAN-OS 12.2.3+, PostgreSQL 18.6+) and Monitor for AI-driven attack automation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating cVE-2025-25249 (FortiOS/FortiSwitchManager CAPWAP heap overflow), Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating aI-driven attacks weaponizing Claude AI for malware rewriting, Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating fraudulent email under an official domain (Revolut), Phishing: Vishing (T1566.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating vishing attack impersonating IT colleague (Odido), and Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating blueMoon Exploit Kit chaining Chromium V8 flaws. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating cVE-2026-0310 (PAN-OS XML processing buffer overflow), Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (T1059.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating postGREShell (CVE-2026-6471) allows code execution via shared libraries, and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating styleSmuggler (Magento/Adobe Commerce zero-day) executes PHP via email templates. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pivotC2 RAT deployed via Fortinet exploitation and Server Software Component: Web Shell (T1505.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating weWorm (WeChat VoIP zero-click exploit) grants full account control. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating cVE-2026-85880 (Windows ALPC), CVE-2026-81963 (Windows Update Stack) and Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (T1548.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 438 elevation-of-privilege flaws in Microsoft Patch Tuesday. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating aI-driven malware rewriting upon detection (Claude AI), Modify Cloud Compute Infrastructure: Create Cloud Instance (T1578.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating exchange mailbox data exfiltrated to Wasabi cloud storage, and Subvert Trust Controls: Install Root Certificate (T1553.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cVE-2026-84393 (FortiOS certificate validation flaw). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory (T1003.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating pivotC2 RAT decrypts VPN credentials (Fortinet), Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers (T1555.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters decompiled 1.8M Android apps for hardcoded secrets, and Adversary-in-the-Middle: ARP Spoofing (T1557.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating cVE-2026-84393 allows MITM attacks on FortiOS ZTNA portals. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery: Domain Account (T1087.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 30,000 FortiGate IPs scanned (Fortinet exploitation) and Network Service Discovery (T1046) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating lG OLED TVs scanning home networks. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating mikroTik RouterOS unauthenticated SSH flaw and Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating windows Server RDP freezes post-patch. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 90 GB of data exfiltrated via Salesforce APIs (Odido), Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exchange mailbox data exfiltrated (Fortinet), and Audio Capture (T1123) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lG OLED TVs recording audio in standby mode. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating pivotC2 RAT uses outbound TLS connections to bypass firewalls and Proxy: External Proxy (T1090.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating blueMoon Exploit Kit used for backdoor deployment. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exchange mailbox data exfiltrated to Wasabi cloud storage and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 90 GB of data exfiltrated via Salesforce APIs (Odido). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating windows Server RDP freezes post-patch and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating €1 million ransom demand (Odido). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (70%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (80%)
Phishing: Vishing (90%)
Drive-by Compromise (60%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (70%)
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Persistence
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (70%)
Server Software Component: Web Shell (60%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (90%)
Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (70%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (80%)
Modify Cloud Compute Infrastructure: Create Cloud Instance (60%)
Subvert Trust Controls: Install Root Certificate (70%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory (80%)
Credentials from Password Stores: Credentials from Web Browsers (70%)
Adversary-in-the-Middle: ARP Spoofing (60%)
Discovery
Account Discovery: Domain Account (70%)
Network Service Discovery (80%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (70%)
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (80%)
Audio Capture (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (90%)
Proxy: External Proxy (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (80%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (70%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)