Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » OCHIN, Inc. » TRIMOSOCHREI1774651014

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (TRIMOSOCHREI1774651014)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-56
Company Score Before Incident398 / 1000
Company Score After Incident342 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERTRIMOSOCHREI1774651014
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII) and...
INCIDENT DATE12/01/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of OCHIN, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts OCHIN, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the OCHIN, Inc. breach identified under incident ID TRIMOSOCHREI1774651014.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of OCHIN, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ochin, the number of followers: 23535, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 989 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 398 and after the incident was 342 with a difference of -56 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on OCHIN, Inc. and their customers.

On 13 January 2026, Health Gorilla disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Health Gorilla Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Patient Information".

Health Gorilla, a Silicon Valley-based healthcare interoperability platform, is under investigation following a data breach that may have exposed sensitive patient information through its health information exchange (HIE) network.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Health information exchange (HIE) network, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) and medical records, including names, dates of birth, addresses, driver’s license and insurance card details, financial information, and clinical data (diagnoses, conditions, lab results, medications, and care plans).

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Temporary suspension of affected health organizations from the HIE network.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data may have been accessed for treatment purposes, but requests or authorizations were not confirmed legitimate and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating breach occurred through its health information exchange (HIE) network. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Cloud Secrets (T1552.006) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized disclosure of health data through its HIE network and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data accessed via HIE network, suggesting compromised or misused credentials. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating compromised PII and medical records, including clinical data, financial information, and personal identifiers and Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breach involved a healthcare interoperability platform (HIE) storing sensitive data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized disclosure of health data through HIE network and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data accessed via cloud-based HIE network. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating investigation ongoing; no confirmation of data destruction and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating clinical data (diagnoses, conditions, lab results) potentially exposed. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Email Hiding Rules (T1564.008) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no confirmation of legitimacy of data access requests and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access via HIE network may have evaded detection. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Trusted Relationship (70%)
Credential Access
Cloud Secrets (60%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Hide Artifacts: Email Hiding Rules (50%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (60%)

Sources & References