Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Oakley Relocation - Agent for North American Van Lines » OAK1770198067

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (OAK1770198067)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-60
Company Score Before Incident749 / 1000
Company Score After Incident689 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBEROAK1770198067
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal and financial data
INCIDENT DATE14/07/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Oakley Relocation - Agent for North American Van Lines's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Oakley Relocation - Agent for North American Van Lines Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Oakley Relocation - Agent for North American Van Lines breach identified under incident ID OAK1770198067.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Oakley Relocation - Agent for North American Van Lines's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/oakley-relocation, the number of followers: 107, the industry type: Truck Transportation and the number of employees: 10 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 689 with a difference of -60 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Oakley Relocation - Agent for North American Van Lines and their customers.

On 15 July 2025, Oakley Relocation disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Oakley Relocation Data Breach Exposing Sensitive Customer Information".

Oakley Relocation, a San Diego-based moving and storage company, detected unauthorized access to its computer systems on July 15, 2025.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Computer systems, and exposing Sensitive personal and financial data.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Secured network, and stakeholders are being briefed through Data privacy notice on website, direct notifications to affected parties.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Complimentary credit monitoring services offered; dedicated assistance line (888-406-8903) set up for inquiries (Monday-Friday, 6 a.m. - 6 p.m. PT).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its computer systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating detected unauthorized access to its computer systems. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive files and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, tax IDs, and financial data exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating copied sensitive files from its systems and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed names, SSNs, medical records, financial data. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unknown party had copied sensitive files from its systems and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach with high sensitivity of compromised data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to computer systems and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high risk of identity theft, financial fraud. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Modify Authentication Process (50%)
OS Credential Dumping (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References