Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTDNYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD
VS
Hapag-Lloyd AGHapag-Lloyd AG
NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD

NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD

1 HarbourFront Place, Singapore, 098633, SG

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nyksm.com.sg/
765/1000Fair

NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT (NYKSM) is an in-house ship management arm of the NYK Group. Established in 2001, NYKSM is a wholly owned subsidiary of NYK and has fast become a preferred ship management company in Singapore. NYKSM provides service of technical management and crew ...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,251
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Ballindamm 25, Hamburg, DE, 20095

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hapag-lloyd.com
797/1000Fair

About Hapag-Lloyd With a fleet of 313 modern container ships and a total transport capacity of 2.5 million TEU, Hapag-Lloyd is one of the world’s leading liner shipping companies. In the Liner Shipping segment, the Company has around 14,000 employees and 400 offices in ...

NAICS:483
NAICS Definition:Water Transportation
Employees:15,039
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD

NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapag-Lloyd AG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hapag-Lloyd AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapag-Lloyd AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD

NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hapag-Lloyd AG

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAP508092125

FAQ

Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD company and Hapag-Lloyd AG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD or Hapag-Lloyd AG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD or Hapag-Lloyd AG ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD and Hapag-Lloyd AG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA