Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Nursa » NUR1780086351

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NUR1780086351)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-82
Company Score Before Incident763 / 1000
Company Score After Incident681 / 1000
Company LinkView Nursa Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERNUR1780086351
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized access to web application
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII), including...
INCIDENT DATE26/02/2026
STATUSUnder investigation

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Nursa's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Nursa Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Nursa breach identified under incident ID NUR1780086351.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Nursa's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nursaapp, the number of followers: 7234, the industry type: Staffing and Recruiting and the number of employees: 988 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 763 and after the incident was 681 with a difference of -82 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Nursa and their customers.

On 20 March 2026, Nursa disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Nursa Healthcare Staffing Platform Data Breach".

Nursa, a U.S.-based healthcare staffing marketplace, experienced a data breach that exposed personally identifiable information (PII) of thousands of users.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Nursa’s web application, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), including names and full dates of birth, with nearly 13,168 records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Immediate steps to secure the platform.

The case underscores how Under investigation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party accessed and exported a subset of user profiles from Nursa’s web application. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party accessed...user profiles from Nursa’s web application (implies account misuse). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data includes names and full dates of birth from user profiles. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party...exported a subset of user profiles (data exfiltration confirmed) and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on exfiltration method, but cloud-based app implies possible cloud transfer. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of manipulation, but unauthorized access implies risk and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of destruction, but breach may enable future actions. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Data Destruction (20%)

Sources & References