Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NTT DOCOMO BUSINESSNTT DOCOMO BUSINESS
VS
AlmavivA ExperienceAlmavivA Experience
NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS

NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS

OTEMACHI PLACE WEST TOWER 2-3-1 Otemachi, Tokyo, 100-8019, JP

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.ntt.com
639/1000Poor

NTT Communications Corporation changed its name to NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS, Inc. on July 1, 2025. As an Industrial and Regional DX Platformer that drives digital transformation across industries and communities, we are enabling the development of a decentralized autonomous ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:2,169
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

Avenida Rebouças 2728, São Paulo, 05402-500, BR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Líder em transformação digital nos mercados de Customer Experience e Debt Collection na América Latina. Combinamos tecnologia, inteligência e excelência operacional para entregar soluções completas que antecipam as necessidades dos nossos Clientes. São mais de 530 mil...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:22,366
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS

NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Experience in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AlmavivA Experience (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlmavivA Experience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS

NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NTT030031025
🔒 Incident : Breach
NTT1055030725
AlmavivA Experience

AlmavivA Experience

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS company and AlmavivA Experience company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS and AlmavivA Experience, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS and AlmavivA Experience, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS or AlmavivA Experience ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS or AlmavivA Experience ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS and AlmavivA Experience, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS and AlmavivA Experience, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2