Comparison Overview
npm, Inc.

npm, Inc.
1999 Harrison St, Oakland, 94612, US
Last Update: 02/10/2026
Over 10 million software developers worldwide use npm, Inc.’s open source software and web registry to discover, share, and reuse packages of code. Our users download over 800,000 packages more than 7 billion times per week, and registry downloads have grown by more tha...

Rakuten
Rakuten Crimson House, Setagaya-ku, 158-0094, JP
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

npm, Inc.







Rakuten






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
npm, Inc. has 2947.62% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Rakuten has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - npm, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
npm, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Rakuten (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rakuten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

npm, Inc.

Rakuten
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.