Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Noma Security » NOM1765375786

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NOM1765375786)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-2
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident749 / 1000
Company LinkView Noma Security Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERNOM1765375786
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORMalicious instructions embedded in Google Workspace documents (Google Docs, Gmail, Google Calendar)
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive corporate information
INCIDENT DATE07/12/2025
STATUSResolved (patches deployed)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Noma Security's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Noma Security Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Noma Security breach identified under incident ID NOM1765375786.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Noma Security's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/noma-security, the number of followers: 8735, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 109 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 749 with a difference of -2 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Noma Security and their customers.

On 08 December 2025, Google disclosed Zero-Click Vulnerability, Indirect Prompt Injection issues under the banner "GeminiJack: Zero-Click Vulnerability in Google Gemini Enterprise Leading to Corporate Data Leaks".

Google patched a zero-click vulnerability in Gemini Enterprise that could lead to corporate data leaks.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Google Gemini Enterprise, Vertex AI Search, Google Workspace (Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar), and exposing Sensitive corporate information.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Separation of Vertex AI Search from Gemini Enterprise, changes to RAG workflows, and began remediation that includes Updates to how Gemini Enterprise and Vertex AI Search interact with retrieval and indexing systems.

The case underscores how Resolved (patches deployed), teams are taking away lessons such as Traditional security controls (perimeter defenses, endpoint protection, DLP) are insufficient to detect AI-driven exfiltration. Organizations must implement robust monitoring and consider trust boundaries when deploying AI systems with access to sensitive data, and recommending next steps like Organizations should: (1) Carefully configure RAG system data sources, (2) Implement enhanced monitoring for AI-driven data access, (3) Stay informed about emerging AI security research, (4) Follow NCSC guidance on mitigating prompt injection attacks.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating architectural weakness in Google Gemini Enterprise and Vertex AI Search and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating malicious instructions embedded in Google Workspace documents (Google Docs, Gmail). Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating zero-click vulnerability in Gemini Enterprise processing routine searches and Command and Scripting Interpreter: JavaScript (T1059.007) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating indirect prompt injection in RAG architecture via AI-driven workflows. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating aI processing authorized Workspace data without explicit user consent. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating aI scanned Google Workspace data (Gmail, Google Docs, Calendar) for sensitive terms and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating rAG architecture enabled automated scanning of authorized data sources. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data transmitted to attacker-controlled server via external image URL and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bypassed traditional security controls using AI-driven exfiltration. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Hide Artifacts: Email Hiding Rules (T1564.008) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating malicious instructions embedded in seemingly benign documents/emails and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating aI used authorized Workspace access to scan and exfiltrate data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References