Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » No Frills » LOBSHONO-1773196440

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LOBSHONO-1773196440)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident766 / 1000
Company Score After Incident708 / 1000
Company LinkView No Frills Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERLOBSHONO-1773196440
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE02/05/2018
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of No Frills's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts No Frills Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the No Frills breach identified under incident ID LOBSHONO-1773196440.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of No Frills's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/no-frills, the number of followers: 14250, the industry type: Retail Groceries and the number of employees: 5915 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 766 and after the incident was 708 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on No Frills and their customers.

Loblaw Companies Limited recently reported "Loblaw Investigates Data Breach Following Suspicious Activity", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Loblaw Companies Limited, one of Canada’s largest grocery and pharmacy retailers, is investigating a potential data breach after detecting suspicious activity within its systems.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating detecting suspicious activity within its systems and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating retailers remain prime targets for cybercriminals. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attackers often seeking payment card information and Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious activity within its systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating potential data breach...personal or financial data was compromised and Data from Removable Media (T1025) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on the nature of the breach. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attackers often seeking payment card information, customer records and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating vast amounts of sensitive data they handle. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on the nature of the breach and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating ongoing risks faced by large retailers. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (40%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (60%)
Modify Authentication Process (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (70%)
Data from Removable Media (30%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (40%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Defacement (20%)

Sources & References