Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Netherlands » NLN1772353652

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NLN1772353652)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-26
Company Score Before Incident762 / 1000
Company Score After Incident736 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERNLN1772353652
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORDistributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE01/07/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Netherlands's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Netherlands Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Netherlands breach identified under incident ID NLN1772353652.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Netherlands's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nlnetherlands, the number of followers: 19002, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 436 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 762 and after the incident was 736 with a difference of -26 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Netherlands and their customers.

International Criminal Court (ICC) recently reported "ICC and Dutch Institutions Targeted in Pro-Russian Cyberattacks During NATO Summit", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

The Hague became the focal point of a cybersecurity incident as Dutch authorities reported a series of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against local governments and institutions ahead of and during the NATO Summit.

Impact assessments are still underway, so the full scope is not yet clear.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Underway.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including series of distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, and attack vector such as Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Service Exhaustion Flood (T1499.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including dDoS attacks against local governments and institutions, and disruption to train traffic (unconfirmed link) and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including possible sabotage as a motive, and pro-Russian hacktivist groups. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Network Denial of Service (T1498) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including sophisticated and targeted cyberattack, and containment measures underway. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Endpoint Denial of Service (90%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Service Exhaustion Flood (80%)
Defacement (50%)
Defense Evasion
Network Denial of Service (70%)

Sources & References