Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Nidec Corporation Global » NID1782815047

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NID1782815047)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-99
Company Score Before Incident763 / 1000
Company Score After Incident664 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERNID1782815047
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPossibility of information leak
INCIDENT DATE21/06/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Nidec Corporation Global's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Nidec Corporation Global Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Nidec Corporation Global breach identified under incident ID NID1782815047.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Nidec Corporation Global's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/nidec-corporation-global, the number of followers: 24594, the industry type: Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing and the number of employees: 11762 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 763 and after the incident was 664 with a difference of -99 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Nidec Corporation Global and their customers.

On 22 June 2026, Nidec Corporation disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Blackfield Ransomware Gang Demands $2M from Nidec After Taiwan Subsidiary Breach".

The Blackfield ransomware group has targeted Nidec Corporation, demanding a $2 million ransom following a cyberattack on its Taiwanese subsidiary, Nidec Chaun Choung Technology.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Servers and networks of Nidec Chaun Choung Technology, and exposing Possibility of information leak.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Server and network shutdowns.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breach was confirmed on June 22, 2026, targeting Taiwanese subsidiary and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attack on its Taiwanese subsidiary, Nidec Chaun Choung Technology. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating blackfield ransomware group has targeted Nidec Corporation. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating server and network shutdowns to contain the damage. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading (T1036) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating blackfield ransomware group...threatening to publish or sell stolen data and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating server and network shutdowns to contain the damage. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating possibility of information leak, though not confirmed and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating samples of leaked files were posted to validate the breach. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating samples of leaked files were posted to validate the breach. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating possibility of information leak, data exfiltration threatened. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating threatened to publish or sell the stolen data if unpaid and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating samples of leaked files posted. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating blackfield ransomware group has targeted Nidec Corporation and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating server and network shutdowns to contain the damage. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (60%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (70%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (60%)
Defense Evasion
Masquerading (70%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (80%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Discovery
File and Directory Discovery (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (80%)
Data Destruction (60%)

Sources & References