Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Newport Wealth Advisors » NEWACC1780432754

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NEWACC1780432754)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-92
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident662 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERNEWACC1780432754
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized access to cloud applications
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers, dates...
INCIDENT DATE03/11/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Newport Wealth Advisors's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Newport Wealth Advisors Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Newport Wealth Advisors breach identified under incident ID NEWACC1780432754.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Newport Wealth Advisors's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/newport-wealth-advisors, the number of followers: 99, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 6 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 662 with a difference of -92 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Newport Wealth Advisors and their customers.

On 04 November 2024, Mariner Wealth Advisors disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Mariner Wealth Advisors Data Breach Affecting Nearly 9,000 Individuals".

Mariner Wealth Advisors disclosed a November 2024 breach involving cloud applications used by three employees, exposing sensitive personal data of nearly 9,000 individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Cloud applications (Google Workspace/Microsoft 365), and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, account numbers, government identification numbers, with nearly 8,995 records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Isolated compromised accounts, and began remediation that includes Engaged external researchers to monitor for exploitation, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure, client notifications.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Persistent risks in financial services despite cybersecurity investments; need for enhanced email security and zero-trust models, and recommending next steps like Adopt zero-trust email security, expand monitoring for data misuse, and ensure compliance with SEC breach notification rules, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals notified.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including involving cloud applications used by three employees, and unauthorized access to cloud applications and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including faced frequent spear-phishing attempts, and potential spear-phishing vulnerabilities. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to cloud applications (employee accounts) and Unsecured Credentials: Cloud Credentials (T1552.006) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including cloud applications used by three employees, and google Workspace and Microsoft 365. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth and Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cloud applications (Google Workspace/Microsoft 365). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including files downloaded by unauthorized actor, and data exfiltration such as Yes and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating criminal third party accessing and downloading files. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating isolated the compromised accounts upon discovery. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data misuse has been found. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (90%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (70%)
Credential Access
Brute Force: Password Guessing (50%)
Unsecured Credentials: Cloud Credentials (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)

Sources & References